Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, I've decided to organize a GB for the R34 bootlid brake light LEDs as pictured below. They are easy to install and this initial group buy will end on FRIDAY 24th of JULY at about 6 PM. The GB won't go ahead unless there are 5 confirmed payments by then.

The price will be $67 (with min. 5 confirmed buyers) or $60 if we can get 10 buyers before friday. This price includes delivery to you in a padded envelope.

The items are ordered via importmonster.com.au through the Yahoo Japan auctions and this is the seller there: http://page7.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/g81202991

Please post here if interested and if you can make a payment by friday. Also, item is displayed below but I cannot guarantee the accuracy of the colours as they're always hard to capture on camera but I suspect they look fine IRL and very similar to what you can see in the photo. No warranty provided either - please buy only if you can risk getting a non functional item and lose your $67 (just covering my ass in case some/all of the items arrive faulty ..althought I highly doubt that)

According to the seller, these are made to order and can take about a week to be manufactured. So I'd say if we place an order on friday, they should be here by mid-august at the latest. Any questions, please ask here don't PM unless it's to confirm payment or to get my bank details. Cheers

post-49910-1248260321_thumb.jpg post-49910-1248260325_thumb.jpg

Edited by Delta Force
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280301-r34-bootlid-brake-leds/
Share on other sites

just to clarify ..this GB is for the '20 LED' version as in the photo. And as I said before, the colour in above photo MAY not be accurate - it's most likely overexposed and the real-life colour is darker (red)

jrm is in I think .. 3 more to go guys.

Edited by Delta Force

I'm sure 20 LEDs will do the trick... we're not trying to blind everyone, just replace the normal single bulb with equivalent or better LED light :)

Besides ..the 32/48s look a bit too 'busy' for my liking and they cost more. Just try to picture how small the lens is ..20 LEDs is surely enough :)

I'm sure 20 LEDs will do the trick... we're not trying to blind everyone, just replace the normal single bulb with equivalent or better LED light :thumbsup:

Besides ..the 32/48s look a bit too 'busy' for my liking and they cost more. Just try to picture how small the lens is ..20 LEDs is surely enough :)

+1 on 20 leds being plenty, less leds spaced apart looks heaps nicer than a tonne crammed into a small area, not to mention the more leds in there, the more dull the light looks, going from those images on yahoo japan.

Id consider this gb, but just not this soon :D

(might be removing bootlid brake light and welding over it)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...