Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just been back from the EPA, and with the boost almost stock it still turned out 92db instead of the approved 90db. He would not pass it and i don't consider my car loud.

So i need to take 2db off it, so whats my best options??

I might replace the 3 inch cat with the standard 2.5 inch cat and try and turn the boost down even further, would this do it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/
Share on other sites

dang.. if its nearly at stock boost levels there probably isn't much else you can do to reduce it further by playing with the boost. You could try and make it spool up very late, so its making maximum boost later on, and hence less noise down low.

Did you put the standard box back on? if anything you want to restrict the airflow the best you can, generally the opposite you'd usually want to do.

Stock cat should be a bit quieter, but might not get you under. I passed with full 3" hi-flow cat, but i think mine was a bit of a freak passing with absolutely no exhaust modifications.

Do you have a resonator in there? (its like a bulge you might see in the pipe). Bends in the pipework i think also tend to reduce the noise a bit.

Otherwise its time to borrow a stock exhaust off somebody.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-583572
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Robo's

Just been back from the EPA, and with the boost almost stock it still turned out 92db instead of the approved 90db. He would not pass it and i don't consider my car loud.

So i need to take 2db off it, so whats my best options??

I might replace the 3 inch cat with the standard 2.5 inch cat and try and turn the boost down even further, would this do it?

THat's farcked!!! Go and ask them how do you know your machine is not farked!!!

ask them to test on other machine...

2db come on that;s nothing compare to harley davison Bikes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-584431
Share on other sites

This story sounds familiar.

I got done for 2dB over the limit nearly 18 months ago now. I fixed it by adding another resonator under the car. Originally I had a hotdog style resonator and barrel type s/s muffler at the back of my 3" system and recorded 92dB. Had another box type resonator installed inline with the hotdog and it brought the reading down to 89dB, just enough to get the EPA off my back.

As long as you use straight through type mufflers and resonators you shouldn't loose too much power, but honestly, I wish I had just borrowed a standard exhaust for the test. It would have saved cutting up a perfectly good exhaust.

Z.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-585786
Share on other sites

OK, if you go the steel wool, good luck. I tried this on rumour and all I managed to do was shoot flaming pieces of steel wool out of the exhaust - was pretty funny actually.

If you have the standard Jap type muffler - sounds like you have an N1 type or similar, most will have a small hole right near the tip at the bottom. This is so you can attach a muffler to the exhaust 'for street use', as a loud exhaust should only be used on the track:)

Autobahn sell the muffler inserts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-586446
Share on other sites

CrazyGTR is spot on, get a piece of thin sheetmetal and put a single smallish hole in the middle, maybe 15mm diameter and put this between the cat and the pipe flange.

If you are clever, it will not be seen, especially if you spray it with black muffler paint around the bright cut edge, before you fit it .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-586979
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...