Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just after your ideas on this and if you have experianced this problem before.

Was out on the weekend when my mates R34 GTT suddenly lost all power. I was behind him in my 34 when it happened and i immedietly noticed black smoke coming out the exhaust.

i assumed it was a blown cooler pipe but after checking them and looking for any other leaks we could not get it to run.

I then tried unplugging the AFM as this was my next guess and it suddenly would run but when driven not rev past about 2500rpm.

Am i right in saying the AFM has blown and by unplugging it the car has gone into limp mode (i noticed the engine check light is on once this is unplugged)?

The car was on light throttle when this happened at about 45km/h.

I had a bit of a search around but couldnt find any problems exactly like this so any help would be greatly appreciated oh and yes i have pulled the AFM apart and the soldering looks perfect.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281730-r34-gtt-blown-afm/
Share on other sites

Early 32's are more prone to dry solder joints then 34's.

Put the ECU into diagnostic mode and check for an AFM error code. Should flash the code back if it's bad. That's if your still using factory management.

You can check the resistance values between the pins to give you an idea if it's bad. Could simply be a dirty AFM wire. But yes I would say it fell back into limp mode when you removed the AFM hence it was able to start.

Edited by James_03
Early 32's are more prone to dry solder joints then 34's.

Put the ECU into diagnostic mode and check for an AFM error code. Should flash the code back if it's bad. That's if your still using factory management.

You can check the resistance values between the pins to give you an idea if it's bad. Could simply be a dirty AFM wire. But yes I would say it fell back into limp mode.

Forgot to mention that car is standard with FMIC and full exhaust.

I will Do the diagnostics test and clean out the AFM and see how that goes thanks for your help.

Yeah see what you get after diags. Just be careful what you use to clean the AFM with.

Most people use a carby cleaner spray which is what I recommend.

I have heard of ppl using all sorts of shit, lemon juice etc lol.

Haha yeh i've heard a few good ones myself but lemon juice is a new one lol.

thanks for ya help.

i highly recommend you dont use anything other then "electrical contact cleaner" it will automatically dry and clean once applied it is used for electrical boards and components.

there will be a residue left on the afm if you use anything else.

Bass

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...