Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt3076r Specifications - Clarification Needed

evsr31

By evsr31,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Aberax Grand Master

Aberax

Posted
Posted
  old mate said:
what size rear is that with mate?
  Aberax said:
I just bought myself this a few weeks ago.

32160820069_large.jpg

32160820071_large.jpg

Some people i have been speaking to in the SA section say that this turbo is too big for a RB25, and that it is going to be real laggy. But i wont really know for a few weeks till i have it installed. That is the 0.82 rear housing i think, it has it stamped inside somewhere.

With that ^^

Haines Rising Star

Haines

Posted
Posted (edited)

Old mate its not a full turbo its just the housing

I believe its the .73 AVO recast nissan housing

I swapped it for the .82 external Grant

so its still the 3076r but now external gate

Edited by Haines
nIsMo86 Experienced

nIsMo86

Posted
Posted (edited)

Is this the twin scroll version that you guys have been using?

I previously had the 3037R which looks identical to the first pictured so called T04S at the start of the thread. It lasted 6 years running 17 or 22 psi and making 250-270atw before having any probs. It dropped a bearing. You guys were saying its crap at the start of this thread but i disagree. I had very good results although it does lag a bit which would be my only complaint. It hit full boost around 4-5k on an rb20 w/ext gate...which are renowned for the lag so it would prob come on alot sooner on a 25.

Anyways, i'm considering getting the 3076R instead of another 3037R due to the twin scroll factor but i'm still unsure. Would this turbo reliably handle 17psi daily and 22psi of boost on and off? Anyone have any experience with this turbo on an rb20? The results look good for rb25's.

Sorry to ask in an rb25 thread...just dont wanna start a new one.

Cheers.

Edited by nIsMo86
discopotato03 Grand Master

discopotato03

Posted
Posted

Well for a start the first one isn't a 3037R or 3037 anything . To be a "3037" you need to have a GT30 turbine and a GT37 compressor wheel .

The 7/14 bladed wheel is not a GT anything , from memory its either a T04S or a 76mm TB41 wheel .

The second one is what you could call a 3037"S" , I believe S is the designation HKS gave their spec Garrett turbos in the GT30 family with port shrouded comp housings and 76.2mm GT37 compressors .

nIsMo86 Experienced

nIsMo86

Posted
Posted
  JonnoHR31 said:
on a 20 22psi will be fine, wont be flowing quiet as much as a 25. i'm running myne at 22psi atm on a 25, loves it

Nice good to hear. Thanks for the feedback.

  discopotato03 said:
Well for a start the first one isn't a 3037R or 3037 anything . To be a "3037" you need to have a GT30 turbine and a GT37 compressor wheel .

The 7/14 bladed wheel is not a GT anything , from memory its either a T04S or a 76mm TB41 wheel .

The second one is what you could call a 3037"S" , I believe S is the designation HKS gave their spec Garrett turbos in the GT30 family with port shrouded comp housings and 76.2mm GT37 compressors .

My front housing looks identical to the turbo in the 1st pic and mine is a 3037R. Was just saying. Mine is a 6 year old turbo and looks different to the current 3037's. The turbine wheels are front 7 blade and rear 10 blade. I cant measure them as they are munched :)

Have any of you guys had any experiences with 3076R on a 20?

discopotato03 Grand Master

discopotato03

Posted
Posted

No that one two post above isn't it either , that thing is called a "GT2876R" because it uses a GT28 NS111 turbine and a 76mm 48 trim 7/14 bladed compressor .

The first one in the first post said 60mm by 55mm turbine so it wont be a 53.8mm GT28 turbine , those are the approximate dimensions of an 84 trim GT30 turbine .

According to my lists there are 24 Garrett and HKS spec units in the "GT30BB" family . For these there are only 9 cartridges so to make up those 24 the variations are in the housings .

A couple of years back I typed out most of the GT30 BB range and posted them on this board .

Cartridge wise there are only 3 "real" GT3076R's or you could call them GT3037's because in the real versions terms it means the same thing .

The most common is the largest compressor trim version or GT37 wheel family in 56T , less common is the GT37 52T version , and quite rare is the GT37 48T version . So all the same 76.2mm dia GT37 or BCI-18C wheels with 56/52/48 trim variations .

They all use the same ~ 60mm GT30 UHP 84 trim turbine in these "REAL" 3037/GT3076R turbos .

56T cartridge 700177-5007 , 52T cartridge 700177-5006 , pretty sure the 48T cartridge is 700177-5005 .

Complete units (minus turbine housings)

56T 700382-5012 - with Port shrouded compressor housing . 700382-5011 for with std comp housing inlet .

52T 700382-5010 - with PS housing . 700382-5009 without .

To be confirmed but 48T unit is said to be 700382-5008 and non PS comp housing only .

Not using the force , the 56T ones are easy to find and the 52T I own .

A .

nIsMo86 Experienced

nIsMo86

Posted
Posted

discopotato03...I'll post up my serial number off the garrett plate on my dead 3037R to compare to your list. I'm curious now to see if it matches anything. Maybe a certain workshop who did the work did a dodgy on the old owner telling him it was a 3037 cause thats how i've been led to believe it. I also have the receipt from this workshop.

Also i recently emailed garrett to price up a 3037R with my serial number and he said it was superceded to a new number. Will post up the new number also. Now the just gotta find the email. Thanks for the very indepth reply disco :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan 路 Posted

      Like I said, "black magic" LOL In the end,  it is what it is, and hopefully, what this here knuckle head has done is an improvement and not a hindrance Not that I actually notice any negatives now, or that I will get any seat of the pants benefits when all is said and done, but best practice says I shouldn't be pulling intake air from the hot engine bay  Famous last words: I cannot see it being any worse than what it is at the moment 馃
    • GTSBoy
      NC MX5

      By GTSBoy 路 Posted

      If the gases flowing in those two tracts had the same properties, you could maybe use such broscience. But the exhaust has a different composition, different normal density, different actual density (because of different normal density, and mostly because of the massively higher temperature), and different viscosity (again because of much higher temperature). Consequently, all of the fluid dynamics parameters that matter, that you calculate from these inputs, such as the Reynolds number, friction factors (for wall friction) and so on, are all incomparable.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy 路 Posted

      And we shall have to presume that Canada is the same?
    • joshuaho96
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By joshuaho96 路 Posted

      In the US almost everything is E10. It can't exceed 10% by much or fuel systems have trouble adapting. At the same time because MTBE, MMT, and TEL are all banned they need as much ethanol in it as possible to boost octane.
    • Kinkstaah
      NC MX5

      By Kinkstaah 路 Posted

      I was mostly jesting. In my experience (and probably only my experience) the R34 GTT physical airbox space is actually too small to flow the amount of power it wanted. By sealing the box, I made it so it could only be fed by the ducts themselves. So you can seal it up and get nice cold air which IS good, but at a certain crossover point: More Hot Air > Less Cold Air I don't think you're at this point. In my case merely ducting the hot air intake with a very focused set of ducts counteracts the fact it's in a V8 engine bay. More cold air obviously best. The solution looks great.
脳
脳
  • Create New...