Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am doing some reading on s/s braided brake lines for the V35 and so far, have come across these brands:

1. Earl's (popular in Japan) ....sub $200 USD delivered

2. Stoptec ...low $200 USD delivered

3. Goodridge...low $200 USD delivered

All of them are TUV, DOT, etc approved in the US.

I just wanted to know if any of you have braided lines for your car, and if so, which brand? I've also heard that it is illegal to have these on your car...Anyone shed light on this?

RS73 told me that he enquired about street-legal ones, but they wanted $500 for the set of 6.....(yes, V35s need 6 lines and they are all the same couplings for Brembos and Non-Brembos)

The cheapest should be Earl's (since they have an office in Syd) and I have already enquired about pricing.

Maybe it's time to setup a GB????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/283446-stainless-steel-braided-brake-lines/
Share on other sites

Well, Earl's just got back to me....they don't do street legal brake lines....so maybe the myth is true....s/s braided lines r illegal in Aust...

ive had MALTECH lines on my 180sx, which are ADR approved and made in OZ

excellent product

i had nismo lines on my s15 but they werent adr approved.

if insurance knows what they are looking for your insurance is void if you have non adr approved braided lines.

I looked up an old email from Maltech, $435 to be precise. last year May.

so you could get USD$200+ shipping which won't be ADR and will void your insurance if they find out about it,

or around $400 but you keep within conditions in your insurer's policy, ie. all parts are street legal.

I've got Maltech lines on the Z33, which are ADR approved. I don't know how well (or how badly) brake lines can work and I also did a Brembo caliper upgrade at the same time so I can't even accurately comment on feel. I have tracked the car since and not died. They're a Victorian company to boot.

V-Sport sells Goodridge lines, which are apparently also ADR approved.

I had Maltech one on my R33 and it didn't have a clear cover put over the top.

It does however have a round 1cm of rubber sleeve at the end of the hose fitting, with ADR approval number imprinted on it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...