Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey people,

Im just after a quick answer to the above question, Im currently running 18psi with standard Internals head gasket. would I be wise to run much more boost later on if I upgrade the turbo or am I asking for trouble without a buit engine and cometic head gasket etc?

I have heard of people running 23odd psi but Im not sure if thats with forgies or standard internals

Mods are:

S2 R33 GTST

Hybrid FMIC

APEXi Super Suction Kit with pod

Custom Air box with CAI(Home Made)

Split Dump and Catco Race Cat

3.5" HKS Cat back Silent High Power exhaust

Exedy 5puk Clutch

Greddy Ex Cam Gear

EMU

Hypergear HighFlow (ATR28 G2 Profile)

Nismo 555 Injectors and Walbro fuel pump

Z32 AFM

Yellow Jacket Coils

Without more info on the turbo, you need to find out the pressure where it starts losing efficiency, or else you're needlessly generating alot more heat than you really be needing to out of the turbos efficiency range.

Ok maybe I should re-phrase my question. We all know that if you rev an unbuilt engine to say 10,000rpm day in and day out it will at some stage let go right?

So does the same thing happen when large amounts of boost is pumped through the same engine?

The max boost my current turbo can run is about 20-25psi but that's not my question.

Let's say hyperthetically I go out and buy X super turbo which has a max efficiency range of say 50psi, now surely if you pump 50psi through a standard internaled engine it will fail as it would revving it to 10k all day.

Does that make make more sense?

Knock levels will be your limiting factor, without lowering your compression or WMI you will get knock.

The combinations that can run more than say 18psi without big knock numbers on a std motor are rare [not impossible]. The more you ask for the worse it will get.

You can wind up the boost, but then you'd have to wind back the timing, so you could be no better off and probably worse than if you hadn't bothered.

But as the others have said - too many worms in the can to say for sure, its not a general rule.

as a very general rule the standard rb25 is reliable for between 250 to 280 rwkw. pick the power you want and choose a turbo to suit. no good having a big laggy turbo for 250 rwkw. if the turbo is sized right for the power and application you want then you only need to run the minimum boost required to get you there.

OP--it sounds as though you think there is a boost number that will pop your motor. There isn't. It's cylinder pressure which if effected by horsepower and knock (and a bunch of other things, but those two pertain to your question.) Like trident mentioned, if it knocks enough, your motor goes pop. Many things can cause knock including to much boost for a given octane of fuel/CR/timing/etc. The other is hp. You try making 1000hp on a motor with stock head bolts, the insane cylinder pressure is going to lift the head and the head gasket will go pop.

Think about how many psi of cylinder pressure you have when the air/fuel mixture goes bang compared to a measly little 30psi of boost. Nothing in comparison. I remember reading a lot of internet "fact" when I first started researching skylines online saying headgaskets go out on RB's at 1.2 bar. Those people had NO clue WTF they were talking about.

Cool that's pretty much what I was after, so long as it's a "safe" tune so to speak there is no majic number.

Thanks for the advice guys.... And not treating me like a dumb dumb, just one of those things I've always been curious about

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...