Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Im considering getting rid of my S14 200sx 5spd and updrading to a R34 GTT.

The R34 AT are a triptronic type yes?. Basically a clutchless manaul? How is this on shifting, is it instant, better than the R33 auto's? Any one have an AT R34GTT?

Thanks

Mario

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28480-r34gtt-at-vs-5mt/
Share on other sites

From what i've found from BMW's, they are quick on the up shift, but a little slow on the down shift. Change gear real quickly going up, but when coming to a corner, from say 4th to 2nd, it takes a little while. But that's what SMG II is for, changes gear in 80 milliseconds!

But if we're talking R34 GT-T's, i'd be going for the manual personally. If u'r doing a lot of city stop/start driving, maybe the auto might be more friendly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28480-r34gtt-at-vs-5mt/#findComment-590285
Share on other sites

never driven a tip tronic car. but i drove ma bro's new mrS spider. that has the full sync box in it. its fun the same feel as a manual, nice to hold flat and go thought the gear. but seems to change gears a little too slowly. also the other problem is the gear box doesnt have the power rating needed for any serious mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28480-r34gtt-at-vs-5mt/#findComment-591309
Share on other sites

Originally posted by SS8_Gohan

From what i've found from BMW's, they are quick on the up shift, but a little slow on the down shift. Change gear real quickly going up, but when coming to a corner, from say 4th to 2nd, it takes a little while. But that's what SMG II is for, changes gear in 80 milliseconds!  

But if we're talking R34 GT-T's, i'd be going for the manual personally. If u'r doing a lot of city stop/start driving, maybe the auto might be more friendly.

The E46 M3 is actually a manual with a sequential shifter, not an auto. There is a clutch working the gearbox but is controlled by either the gearshift (up and down) or the paddles on the wheel. On the harshest setting, the changes will take place in 80 milliseconds.

Go the manual!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28480-r34gtt-at-vs-5mt/#findComment-591327
Share on other sites

Hey ppls

Tiptronic is simply an automatic gearbox with a naff little selector.

Same drive and all of an auto.

A CLUTCHLESS MANUAL or CLUTCHLESS SEQUENCIAL is that shit though. Like the M3 BMW or the Lamboghini E-Gear, or the Enzo Ferrari type gearboxes. 80ms change!!! nice.

If you buy a tiptronic, its just an auto.

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28480-r34gtt-at-vs-5mt/#findComment-591374
Share on other sites

SKY33

If you want to speak with someone on here that has an R34 GTT Tiptronic - PM Assassin, he has one, he's in Melbourne too!

The tiptronic should be cheaper than a 5spd, from what I have gathered over the years Auto is Standard in Japan and manual is actually an optional extra - exactly the opposite to OZ.

Cheers :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28480-r34gtt-at-vs-5mt/#findComment-591468
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...