Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys just got a few issues and ima get to the point.. i have a r33 s2 stock turbo,r34 smic,full 3" stainless steel exhaust system and stock ecu,boost control, running on 10psi..NOw i can only buy a power fc or upgrade my turbo..SO i went with the power fc......now my issue is how much power will i get from it and is this even possible?....if i dont buy a fmic will the r34 smic be enough? if so how much boost can it handle with the new ecu...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/285661-power-fc-with-stock-turbo/
Share on other sites

R34 GTT SMIC is good for up to about 200kw atw, at that stage you will be at the stock turbo's limit...

Tunning the PFC might give u some extra kw but not much.

Basically theres nothing wrong using PFC with your current setup, its just that if you are not planning on modding it further (bigger turbo, injectors etc etc, also you need a proper FMIC at that stage), then the PFC is kinda not needed & a piggy back would do & save u some $$$.

EDIT for the boost on stock turbo, most people say the limit should be 12psi. But I will just stick with 10, don't want it to go BANG!

Edited by Mayuri Krab

a well setup GTST even with the PFC and stock turbo is amazing

once it is tuned correctly and setup the car is completely different to drive

you should be able to hit 200rwkw with stock turbo and PFC

but i would seriously change to a FMIC, the SMIC will just heatsoak itself when you are going hard at it repeatedly

a well setup GTST even with the PFC and stock turbo is amazing

once it is tuned correctly and setup the car is completely different to drive

you should be able to hit 200rwkw with stock turbo and PFC

but i would seriously change to a FMIC, the SMIC will just heatsoak itself when you are going hard at it repeatedly

Spot on although depending on the stock turbo's health i wouldn't be trying to push for 200kws but is achievable like Paul said.

i was thinking of getting a fmic but i dont want any lag and a late turbo response..

FMIC is a must IMO "if" you are considering more mods later (turbo, injectors etc) and you will not notice a large change with response after fitting a FMIC and running a stock turbo.

IMO giving the rarity of genuine PFC's for R32's i would snap it up while you can and look at fuel pump (an ABSOLUTE MUST) FMIC then turbo upgrade when you can afford it. Depending on how it drives now why not leave the stock ecu in there and with the money you would save from tuning the PFC spend on the rest of the set up and do it all at once :cool:

agree FMIC is a must have, i wouldnt even bother trying to get power with the stock SMIC

sure it will make power and work, but youll get heatsoaked in the ass on repeated power runs on the street

if you fit a FMIC and tune the car along with boost and exhaust changes you wont loose any reponse

as part of the complete change, it wont be noticable, the negilible throttle variance is negated once you tune the IGN maps

if you fit the FMIC and change nothing (i did this on my car at some point) then difference is only noticable and thats the throttle to power response time. the time from when you touch the pedal to the time the engine makes power or "responds". i would put it down to an extra maybe 200ms in response time? its noticable, but hardly anything. and like i said, once you do the other stuff, its negated.

theres no late turbo response - just throttle open variance delay (if you can call it that?)

a well setup GTST even with the PFC and stock turbo is amazing

once it is tuned correctly and setup the car is completely different to drive

you should be able to hit 200rwkw with stock turbo and PFC

but i would seriously change to a FMIC, the SMIC will just heatsoak itself when you are going hard at it repeatedly

Absolutely agree with Paul. i can tell you from first hand experience its an amazing difference between stock computer and power FC on 10psi with stock turbo. The extra torque and mid range is amazing, really does feel like a different car to drive. Well worth it in my opinion.

Get a FMIC mate, It will make a big difference. You can get 2 options even get a intercooler going to your return stock flow or you can get the intercooler where you cut a hole in the engine bay.

It all comes down to what you want the car for, if your happy with around 200rwkw and the only thing your going to do is a quick run from the lights now and then the setup you have with the pfc and 34 smic is fine, but if your planning track days or prolonged thrashing then a fmic is a must, and if your in vic then a return flow fmic is recommended.

With that said though at 200rwkw you have reached the limit of you smic, injectors, afm, fuel pump and ecu so a bigger turbo will require an update of these parts as well.

Personally i would go the ecu, drive it around till the bug bites for more power then update in this order:

1) fmic

2) fuel pump

3) afm

4) injectors

5) turbo

Edited by W0rp3D
FUEL PUMP IS A MUST!!!

im in the same boat. Had the 34SMIC and was running between 10-12psi. Remapped ECU. exactly 200kw ATW. But it developed engine ping issues and suffered during the day mainly, 200kw with that intercooler seems the absolute max it could handle... Finally pissed of the r34SMIC and got JJR Return flow front mount. Fixed the ping entirely. The car obviously needed it. Seems to have sorted a few issues.

Fuel pump then FMIC cobber :D

I would go the other way, i still have standard injectors, afm and fuel pump with a hi flow turbo and pfc, fuel pump keeps up fine, the afm is the first to max out then the injectors, have had the injectors to 100% and fuel pump is keeping up just fine.

I would go the other way, i still have standard injectors, afm and fuel pump with a hi flow turbo and pfc, fuel pump keeps up fine, the afm is the first to max out then the injectors, have had the injectors to 100% and fuel pump is keeping up just fine.

Thats all well and good that it keeps up but think of it this way, its nearly 20years old. For the sake of $200 id be going a fuel pump over a FMIC cause the last thing you want it to do is crap itself or lean out once you start winding a little more boost into it while tuning :thumbsup:

if the fuel pump fails its not an issue as the engine will just stall

its only an issue if the pump cant keep up

at 190rwkw at 0.80bar (11.6 PSI) my stock pump was leaning out

so i installed a GTR pump and retuned it to 0.85 bar which is 12.3PSI

so it does pay to upgrade the fuel pump

I would go the other way, i still have standard injectors, afm and fuel pump with a hi flow turbo and pfc, fuel pump keeps up fine, the afm is the first to max out then the injectors, have had the injectors to 100% and fuel pump is keeping up just fine.

you could use a 50hp fuel pump and still max the injectors, they'll max really early tho as the pressure wont be there to flow anywhere near 370cc

fuel pump

fmic

ecu

Thats all well and good that it keeps up but think of it this way, its nearly 20years old. For the sake of $200 id be going a fuel pump over a FMIC cause the last thing you want it to do is crap itself or lean out once you start winding a little more boost into it while tuning :happy:

I guess i come from the school of do it once and do it properly, a $200 fmic kit is not doing it properly in my books.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...