Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey there im after some advices.

k im after kinda new system.

Current speaker system consist of:

6X9 splits Rears

6.5 Fronts

Both speakers are Kenwood brand.. dunno wat model tho.. since it was done by the previous owner in jap.

So far ive replace the old crappy deck headunit with pioneer P6050 Headunit

I am also planning to get Alpine Type R 6.5inch Splits front.

So my problem is now... should i get new rears speakers??? n also Do i need an Amp???

Music i like to listen to is RnB and Pop

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287761-need-some-audio-guru-advice/
Share on other sites

Really hoping the budget will be under 1000 mark.

Also i hav questions abt Amps i looked at some alpine amps do i really need to get one with BIG power??

like wat r the benfits between havin a F600 over a F300?? wat does the channel mean 2 and 4??

Sorri im a complete noob

Edited by bnr034

Rear speakers - no

Amp - Yes

is $1000 for head unit speakers and amp?

I've installed type R's into a few mates cars and they sound good for the money.

If you went the alpine amp you'd only need the f300 and bridge it to 2x150w or if you want a cheaper option the Jaycar amps are great value for money, I've got one sitting at home waiting to go in a mates car.

your head deck will come with a inbuilt amp in it but it wont be as good as hooking up the speakers thru a proper amp and the sound quality will improve. also each channel is for each speaker so you will need a 4 channel to run all 4 speakers

Rear speakers - no

Amp - Yes

is $1000 for head unit speakers and amp?

I've installed type R's into a few mates cars and they sound good for the money.

If you went the alpine amp you'd only need the f300 and bridge it to 2x150w or if you want a cheaper option the Jaycar amps are great value for money, I've got one sitting at home waiting to go in a mates car.

Ive alrdy have the headunit. Right now its the matter of whether gettin New rear speakers and an Amp or not. Also which Amp to go for.

Budget for Front Speakers, Rear Speakers n Amp hopefully under the $1000 mark

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...