Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 With Rb25, Getting It Past A Regency Inspection.


Recommended Posts

I'm looking at purchasing an R32 skyline with an RB25DET in it from VIC, now the car is registered but only with the RB20DET so when I get it inspected at sturt it will obviously fail the numbers check. What would I need to change to get it through a regency inspection?

I know it needs R33 brakes. The car currently has a aftermarket fuel reg, pod, fmic, high flow turbo, exhaust, wold 3D ecu, vented catch can, rims and suspension.

http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2346/skyline2h.jpg

Now the owner has said he can supply the original ecu, afm, stock cooler and piping and wheels. I can get an exhaust that is stock off a mate to put on it. How many of these things would need to be changed to get it past? I was planning on changing them all minus the fuel reg, however I'd rather not change the ECU unless its necessary, as it would be dangerous to run the motor with a stock map.

Also how much would the change of rego cost? Is it much on top of the standard transferral fees ?

Edited by Rolls

It'll have to be completely standard, all the factory emission stuff has to be in place and it'll have an idle CO2 and hydrocarbon test as well, which it will pass with the facotry ECU in place.

It should be just an inspection though and no engineering will be required.

I'm getting all the parts togetther to do a RB25 conversion on a 180sx so if you need some of the factory stuff then i have pretty much everything provided your 25 is a series II.

EDIT! (now that i've actually read your post)

You will need to remove the FPR and you will need to put the standard ECU in (infact when you produce the car to be inspected you have to allow the easy access to the ECU I.e. remove the kick pannel). It would be a good idea to find a factory turbo and fit that as well.

Edited by D_Stirls

if your really keen you can run a high flow turbo @ factory boost on factory ECU and do no damage and will prolly pull simulat CO2 emissions as factory turbo

or buy Adrians his is 32 with 25 and local

mine has passed regency many time and has all perfect nothlene bushes control arms etc, just needs brakes and stock suspension..

pm me if you want info

Think I just spoke to you on the phone hehe.

  • 2 weeks later...

Decided to get the car in vic, have all the bits to make it pass an inspection supplied by the owner and the few that arent a mate is lending to me, refer here if you want to add any suggestions:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/De...80#entry4845591

Cheers

  • 1 month later...

Hey i am facing a scenario almost the same - I am thinking of buying a 32 with RB25 in it from Victoria and i am in Adelaide. The guy i am thinking about buying it from in Vic put the RB25 in and spoke with Vic Roads and told them his original engine blew up but here is the new engine number and it has now passed his rwc and is registered with that engine number. They were not educated of the fact it was a different capacity engine but it is still registered with the RB25 engine number. I want to know what would happen if i tried to register it here? -Apparently they apply system notes as to new engine numbers and stuff so i am concerned they might pick up on this?

Hey i am facing a scenario almost the same - I am thinking of buying a 32 with RB25 in it from Victoria and i am in Adelaide. The guy i am thinking about buying it from in Vic put the RB25 in and spoke with Vic Roads and told them his original engine blew up but here is the new engine number and it has now passed his rwc and is registered with that engine number. They were not educated of the fact it was a different capacity engine but it is still registered with the RB25 engine number. I want to know what would happen if i tried to register it here? -Apparently they apply system notes as to new engine numbers and stuff so i am concerned they might pick up on this?

Probably will get through with a numbers check as they will match up, however if you get a cluey officer and they notice that it is the bigger motor they may send you to regency, I'd say its a bit of a gamble, but not too much of one.

Worst case you have to upgrade the brakes and get the car inspected, something you should be doing anyway. If the car is ridiculously modded I would think twice however.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...