Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just go all out and trade for a commodore. :)

why would i do that lol skylines eat them and why sell your car thats pretty sweet

thanks everyone for replying, it looks like im staying with the 33 coupe

cheers

Edited by spence01

buy a hyandai... i hear they go

....

to the tip! lawl

go coupe ftw... mind you, you can kit up a 34 4 door hellll secks...

and 33's are as common as a falcodore :) but it's your decision, everyone has their own tastes :down: either way both manual both turbo... meh? :mad:

Z tune R34 GTR FTW :P lol as brendan said all personal taste...some people love the R32, or the 33 or 34 i mean if u WANT a R34 then go for it aye cause if u buy a R33 u might regret it in the end personally i'd buy a R34 due to its newer condition but if your tight on cash just buy a R33 S2 :cool:

I have a 4 door 34 and i love it! My mate has the 34 coupe. He loves it. I bought mine coz its a sporty quick car. More practical but not as fun as a 2 door. If i didn't care about having four doors i would have definately gone coupe. Agree with br3ndan it is definately personal preference.

I have a 4 door 34 and i love it, prefer the look of it to the coupe any day plus its something a little different.. All down to what you like mate and what you can afford, i had plenty of people trying to tell me what i should and shouldn't get in the end i thought f**k 'em - went out on a limb and i haven't looked back. I still admire my own car regularly and enjoy washing an waxing it whenever i get the chance regardless of what anybody else says or thinks! Best of luck with your decision. :(

34GTR's are the only decent looking 34 in my opinion, any other 34 looks truck spec, just something about the way they sit. S2 R33's are nice, too many white ones floating about though... they're like excels these days..... hehe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...