Jump to content
SAU Community

What Can I Modify Without Approval?.... And Im240 Update.


Recommended Posts

And the list is out on what mods you can make without DPI approval including SUNVISORS and STEREO SYSTEMS.

One thing though the part just on exhausts is actually quite easy to understand, so more thought has been put into this. LINK to Modified exhaust systems

LINK to What can I modify without approval?

Many minor vehicle modifications can be carried out without specific approval. However, they are still subject to compliance with the Road Traffic (Vehicle Standards) Regulations 2002, Road Traffic (Vehicle Standards) Rules 2002 and the Australian Design Rules (for date of manufacture and vehicle category).

Please note: This isn't an exhaustive list of modifications that don't require approval. Please contact us to check the status of your particular modification.

LINK TO Visit our When Is Approval Required? section for details on other common modifications which do require approval.

Modifications you can make without approval include:

* Tyre size and aspect ratio

* Additional lighting

* Single tone air horns

* Air conditioners

* Air shock absorbers

* Alarm systems

* Badge bars

* Gearbox (pre 1976)

* Mud spats and pebble guards

* mesh stone shields for wind screens and lamps

* Body markings and speed striping

* Rear-view mirrors

* Roof racks

* Radio and stereo systems

* Sunvisors

* Optional manufacturer seating

* seat belts for pre 1969 cars (no full harness types)

* Stabilise bars

* Torque rods and traction bars (not semi-tramp types)

* Venetian blinds and other internal screening systems are allowed subject to a clear view to the rear

Remember, generally, no modification may be carried out if it :

* reduces the strength of the vehicle body

* reduces the controllability of the vehicle

* reduces the safety of the vehicle

LINK TO Emission Testing of Light Vehicles in WA.

The Department of Transport has introduced a moratorium on IM240 emissions testing. The purpose of the moratorium is to allow existing requirements to be reviewed to address industry stakeholder concerns. During this period, a temporary modification permit, valid for six months, will be issued for vehicles that may require IM240 testing under the revised policy.

Vehicles with modifications likely to affect emissions will need to be assessed by the Transport's Vehicle Safety and Standards Section (VSSS).

Engineering reports, other information and checklists that demonstrate the vehicle complies with standards will still be requested.

Until the new IM240 testing policy is introduced, the requirement to submit evidence of emission testing will be deferred for a limited period of six (6) months only. The Department may require a five gas analyser test as assurance that the vehicle does not have extremely high levels of emissions.

Providing all other criteria are met, a modification permit valid for six (6) months will be issued.

A second, permanent modification permit will be issued after the six month period expires, provided that the vehicle passes any emission testing required under the new policy.

Which modifications are affected?

In general, the following modifications are likely to have an effect on emissions and are dealt with under this policy:

o

Engines modified by the fitment of a supercharger or turbocharger

o

Individually constructed vehicles (ICVs)

o

Engines that have been significantly modified to enhance performance (e.g. with the fitment of a high performance camshaft)

o

When there is reprogramming of the electronic control unit (ECU, the engine management computer), or a chip swap

o

Major modifications to the exhaust systems - where the catalytic converter has been replaced with one that may not be fit for purpose or where the operation of the catalytic converter may be affected by aftermarket modifications (such as extractors) or significant relocation from the original position

NB: Certain minor modifications of the exhaust system may be deemed unlikely to impact significantly upon vehicle emissions. In this case, the owner will be issued with a permanent modification permit and will not be required to undertake future IM240 testing for the modification(s) in question.

IMPORTANT

The IM240 emission test is still a valid test. Should you choose to undertake the test and consequently pass it, then you will satisfy the policy requirements.

I'm doing coil-overs, POD, and 'zaust at the moment.

My instinct is to 'fcuk it' and not bother with permit BS and the costly emissions test.

I'm worried I'll void my insurance though?

Im sure as long as u mention all your mods to insurance its all valid

Mmm im pretty sure for insurance to be valid, the mods need to be legal, as they may claim it was your modification that caused the car to crash or sustain or inflict heavy damage. Permits will counter any claims the insurance may have that your mods are not safe. If it were me i would rather know they were legal, pits and engineers will not usually give you a hard time as long as your mods are actually safe and legal. Cops on the other hand would love you to not have permits

Im pretty sure coilovers, pod and exhaust wont affect insurance

almost all skylines have pod and exhaust and if they didnt cause the accident

insurance has no excuse to not pay out

It would be pretty hard for insurance to prove a pod or exhaust casued the accident (why not call your insurnace up and asK?)

Yes permits would serve a better piece of mind

but its not like an engine conversion or a huge f**k off T88 turbo

Im pretty sure coilovers, pod and exhaust wont affect insurance

almost all skylines have pod and exhaust and if they didnt cause the accident

insurance has no excuse to not pay out

It would be pretty hard for insurance to prove a pod or exhaust casued the accident (why not call your insurnace up and asK?)

Yes permits would serve a better piece of mind

but its not like an engine conversion or a huge f**k off T88 turbo

Yeh no, fair call, i wasn't really being specific to his mods, was just saying insurance will require legal mods. Those mods won't have any dramas, just saying that if you were to be doing a mod that may be considered illegal, then you had best get it done legally to avoid trouble

my tein super streets jap specs on my 32 are permitted, also my bride brix II seats are too.

what about gauges, always getting told off because obstucting view (when its on the A piller), have you seen other peeps with their big arse gps right in the middle of the windscreen

also why do cops say you need permits for just about everything you have changed in your car where only a small percentage of the mods need permits

on my 32 on my form i filled it out for, rb26, brides, coilovers, pods, oil cooler, front mount, strut braces, steering wheel, exhaust.

and all that need appoval was, the rb26, seats and coilovers well thats all that was said on my permits.

what about gauges, always getting told off because obstucting view (when its on the A piller), have you seen other peeps with their big arse gps right in the middle of the windscreen

The other explanation I got was aftermarket boost gauges can distract u from driving but a GPS won't... some how :P

mate went over today and just passed, kosteci's said that the test is being trialed for the next 6 months as is, then they will do improvements to it :)

cost him 750 the first time and 850 the second time through. he put the car back to stock (vy commo) and only just passed. and get this, one of the costs was to tie down to the dyno and warm up his car, cost *** $230***. WTF :D

mate went over today and just passed, kosteci's said that the test is being trialed for the next 6 months as is, then they will do improvements to it :down:

cost him 750 the first time and 850 the second time through. he put the car back to stock (vy commo) and only just passed. and get this, one of the costs was to tie down to the dyno and warm up his car, cost *** $230***. WTF :P

So in other words Kosteci is still running the monopoly? :down:

mate went over today and just passed, kosteci's said that the test is being trialed for the next 6 months as is, then they will do improvements to it ;)

cost him 750 the first time and 850 the second time through. he put the car back to stock (vy commo) and only just passed. and get this, one of the costs was to tie down to the dyno and warm up his car, cost *** $230***. WTF :P

Wait, what!? Didnt the first post of this thread detail there was a moratorium on this bullshit IM240 test for six months? Why is your mate bothering to get the test at Kosteci's, and why are they still charging like wounded bulls when their practices are obviously under the microscope??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's not a transistor --- it's marked ZD1 which makes it a zener diode. As to what the breakdown voltage is, not enough there to divine.
    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • The incentives are mostly the same, yes. Ethanol is cheap compared to the cost of doing 98-100 RON with crude oil alone. 87 to 93-94 AKI all with E10. In 2020 Canada mandated E10 as a part of their "renewable fuel standard" and is supposedly going to go to E15 in 2030. In California where there are only 8 refineries with two threatening to shut down next year it's been over 20 years now of E10 and 91 AKI maximum because there's just not enough refinery capacity or crude oil supply relative to the demand for premium unleaded fuel. And CARB's low carbon fuel standard means functionally none of the diesel available at the pump is made from crude oil anymore. It's almost all entirely 20% biodiesel blended with 80% renewable diesel (hydrotreated vegetable oil) now. The number of gasoline vehicles that support E15 or higher ethanol concentrations is surprisingly low, I can't imagine it being wise to play tricks like this without flex fuel sensors in most of the fleet.
    • It's almost certainly the same as the one next to it. Have a fish around amongst these hits https://www.google.com/search?q=surface+mount+transistor+m33&sca_esv=9cb49794e0b2005d&source=hp&ei=2vJ5aNjTB7Kw0PEPldnS8QM&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaHoA6qkfmF6XcygtrZ4Vu9f92NXF_RFd&ved=0ahUKEwjYqIPP7MWOAxUyGDQIHZWsND4Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=surface+mount+transistor+m33&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhxzdXJmYWNlIG1vdW50IHRyYW5zaXN0b3IgbTMzMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjKCFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAHfAaAB3wGqAQMyLTG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgGgAuYBmAMAkgcDMi0xoAfMBLIHAzItMbgH5gHCBwMyLTHIBwU&sclient=gws-wiz
    • South Australia, which is hardly as far behind as the rest pf Oz makes out, and who is also not a paragon of progressiveness (read that as over-legislation) in the area of vehicle standards, has this to say on the subject: Adjustable coil-over suspension Aftermarket adjustable coil-over suspension components are suspension units that incorporate an external thread on the main body and corresponding threaded spring saddle that allows the vehicle's suspension height to be varied. If fitting aftermarket or coil-over suspension components you must submit an Application to modify a light motor vehicle form and a report from a light vehicle engineering signatory (LVES).
×
×
  • Create New...