Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was told by "unique autosport" that there is a difference in the z32 AFM's could someone tell me what it is

cause i googled it and i found nothing. I have a s1 r33 putting a rb25det engine in and i will be modifying it

so i wanted the z32 afm. he said that i need the z32 Twin Turbo afm... is this correct and how can i find 1?

and 1 more thing i have been on the forums after a pfc with or without hc, pref without... but everyone has sold them

could someone tell me how i might be able to get my hands on 1 if u know someone or maybe a website or jap wrecker.

thanks.

Edited by Stealthynsa
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290841-how-do-i-identify-the-right-z32-afm/
Share on other sites

As far as i know, all z32 afms are the same. Whether it came from a TT or NA.

I got one off an NA and it has the same part numbers on the label as the TT unit.

I also did a bit of research before buying it, and found zed owners had already discussed this at length, and apparently they are the same unit.

this is what you want the part numbers (in orange) to be.

bosch-z32afm-label.jpg

but, as i havent actually used it yet, i'd also like some confirmation from someone who knows if the NA and TT are the same.

Edited by Munkyb0y

quote 'Munkyb0y'

but, as i havent actually used it yet, i'd also like some confirmation from someone who knows if the NA and TT are the same.

and do i get 1 with the same codes in the orange or that black code?

lol i just dont wanna waist money

Edited by Stealthynsa
they are all the same the only difference is as paul said there are fake ones but genuine are all the same

dunno if this is a dum question lol but whats the odds of buying a fake afm with the right label?

has anyone ever had this done to them cause it would really suck.

cause i found 1 on the net for $180 and $20 delivery and im thinking would it be fake at all...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...