Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My last two clutches were Jim Berry Race clutch and an Xtreme. Both twin plates. Neither have missed a beat.

+1

Twin plate sounds like the plan, I use to have a HKS twin plate, great for the higher RPM lunches and plenty of grip.

street use some times on track

now is got 230kw planing to go up to 360kw

A single extra heavy duty clutch plate should hold up fine for 230 kW's, all the way to just over 300 kW's IMO, I drove a V-Spec II Nur with 306 kW's at the rears and the single is holding up fine.

Any Japanese brand should do you fine, eg. HKS, OS Giken etc.

I think you be pushing it with a single when getting up to 360 kW's... Again, HKS, OS Giken should do you fine for the twin plates.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/291399-r34-gtr-clutch/#findComment-4874401
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

definitely twin plate, i have the nismo coppermix and its great; grips nicely, dosent slip but is still nice and light for street use, none of the on-off jerkyness unless you get the friction point just right e.g. jim berry full monty clutch i tried to drive on my mates r34 - couldnt do it lolz

i was able to teach myself manual with the coppermix, without difficulty - i will use nothing but in future.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/291399-r34-gtr-clutch/#findComment-4907677
Share on other sites

so twin plate

go for it I gess

also what pice range I am looking them?

NISMO SUPER COPPERMIX - TWIN PLATE CLUTCH

Product # 3002B-RSR48 - Nissan - Skyline BNR34 - RB26DETT - $2,098.02 AUS

- http://www.nengun.com/nismo/super-coppermi...in-plate-clutch

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/291399-r34-gtr-clutch/#findComment-4908843
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...