Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not that I know what I'm spending it on? May put it away for an overseas holiday ;).

im thinking about doing the latter.

might spend it on finally getting a retune on e85 for the 200 though.

FARK! THATS JUST GETTING INSANE!!!!!!!

we have to be the worst of in aust right?

pretty well.

Can be bothered quoting all the posts for the replies.

All the simota 4 piston calipers use the same pads, thats skyline, Z32 and S-series. The R33 have a larger diameter but not larger area.

There is no point in putting a RB26 head on an RB25 block, the ports are the same size, the combustion chamber has the same volume; the only advantage is the 26 has solid lifters but when you consider that a complete 26 head is between $1500 - $2000 you could probably turn a 25 head into a solid head for less.

And the 25 head has a has VTC.

Edited by D_Stirls
Abe i could get vct working with a controller but it doesn't interest me gtr's dont use it dont think you loose that much with out it, my seat of the pants dyno didn't feel that much lose in response

Ok, Well depending which cams I drop in, I may not be able to use VCT anyway...if anyone knows someone who is selling a RB25DET Head, let me know, K Thanks....Now off to work.

Wow! Copping some abuse from an Ebay keyboard warrior :)

I bid and won a crank and rods for my RS250 racebike so I could start the rebuild. I organise to bid on a piston kit he has and he agrees to wait until bidding on the next item has finished so I can take them both as the one package. Before the auction ends (3 days after winning the crank) I get an abusive email from him, saying pay now because he has other people offering mroe money for it. I promptly inform him that I am the winning bidder and we had an agreement on a combined payment for other items still at auction. He ignores me and sells the items to another buyer. Money hungry wanker. He only got 1/4 of what the crank could have gone for, but he must honour the auction.

I've reported him to ebay and given negative feedback. Now he's sending abusive emails like this ...

Dear **************,

your a f**kn puff the crank sold for less ,you are a week little boy hid,n behind your computer , do the world a favour and f**k off

- 6321kris 320523152698.jpgEnd time:06-May-10 19:09:29 AESTSeller:

Listing Status:This message was sent while the listing was closed.

I've copied the email to Ebay. See what they do with the guy now. My response to him was that if he was going to send abusive emails, he should at least learn grammar and some spelling first. :)

:blink:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...