Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have the Ultra MDI fitted to my car (was on it when I purchased). From the very start I've had ignition problems, first with the standard coil packs (which were quickly replaced with Splitfires) as well as spark plugs.

In the 18 months I've had the car I've probably gone through over 10 sets of spark plugs and just recently a set of Iridium's only lasted 10 days! Most of the time I've been using BCPR6EY-11 gapped to 0.8mm. Everything's fine for a couple of weeks then the car starts misfiring / spluttering. I'm thinking the extra voltage / current from the MDI is killing my spark plugs but I'm not 100% sure. I got a 2nd hand coil pack wiring loom (in bad condition) to bypass the MDI but it makes the car even worse with brand new plugs. I've tried colder plugs, and gapped a couple of sets to 0.7mm but no joy. I'm thinking a new loom from Nissan might solve my issues but at $300ish it's a gamble.

The engine is stock running a Power FC, runs 1.1 bar of boost on standard R34 GTR turbos. Pic of MDI units below, any advice would be appreciated.

mdi.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292415-multi-discharge-ignition-systems/
Share on other sites

Coil pack looms are $150 from Nissan, not $300.

I purchased one when i was doing my motor install 18 months ago.

When did these MDI things go in exactly (in that 18month period).

And what was happening when the splitfires were in there? They should have been fine, so its sounding like something other than coilpacks to be honest... so going to the MDI would not have fixed it.

Thanks for the responses guys - firstly it plays up all the time (once the spark plugs have given up) but only over about 5,000rpm and at full boost, light throttle is fine. I rang Nissan last week for a price on the coil pack loom and it was definately over $200, can't remember exactly. The MDI was in the car when I bought it - to be honest I can't see a need for it being there as the engine is only stock and not running huge numbers.

I think I might just take a chance and buy the wiring loom and take the MDI's out of the car. Maybe as Brad said the ignitor is stuffed as well??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...