Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Howdy,

My mate and I considering having a mould made of his body-kit from his 33 GTR so we can reproduce it and I can get one on my GTST. We are looking at getting the mould done in Brisbane early next year and producing a copies soon after. I am posting this thread so that if anybody is interested in having a copy made up for themselves they can express it and let me know at: [email protected]

We are YET to determine prices for the whole process and are willing to post interstate. More information such as costs, payment etc will be posted at a latter date. I am simply getting the word out early so people can think about it.

Kit Includes:

Front Bar

Side Skirts

Rear Skirt

And possibly the rear wing at this stage.

We are willing to sell separately..

Cheers

Haro.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29254-nizmo-body-kit-replica/
Share on other sites

Yep, PM sent.

Would like to know about the quality of the parts though, I'm picky with fit and finish.

Will they be as good as other after market stuff like at jetspeed and carmate.

Or will they even better like the kits at nismo.com.au (Unique Auto sports).

Keep us posted,

(excuse the pun)

Steve.

Hi,

thanks for the interest, I to am very fussy about quality and ease of application, so once we get these things done early new year, i will go through the process of fitting them and i will let you and everybody know how it was and how they came up.

If anybody is interested, please let me know as once these things are good to go , i can get in touch with u all and get the ball rolling..

Cheers

Haro

([email protected])

Haro,,,I don't mean to be rude or to be a damper on your great idea,,but with only 2 posts on our site I think you are going to find it just a little bit hard to get a lot of interest. Try posting on our site,,,so people get to know you before posting such an undertaking.

51jay is right as well,,,a GTR kit will not fit a GTS-T.

Neil.

Hi Sentric dancer,

The prices will come to you as soon as i know them myself...early next year.

To 51jay and Neil,

Cheers for your advise guys (no offence taken) , i am aware of the GTR and GTST difference and thats why we are planning on making a few changes here and there....once the first is done, we begin the task of fine tuning so it can fit the GTST easier (using mine as the test dummy).

I realise many of the users here do not know me, but im not here to stuff anybody around...im just letting u know my intentions and if people are keen please let me know.

Cheers..ill keep u all posted as to my progress in the new year

Haro.

How much you looking at just selling the sideskirts?

I may be wrong ,,but those side skirts look identical to those on the 400R kit that UAS sell for $450 a pair

HARO ,, the pics look nice ,,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...