Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Idiot LOL!

Sorry, but as much as you'd like it - im not going to snap at you, or even try and 'battle' your post - nobodys here for that. Just go off and read my last post again and again and again, then try and clarify your disposition.

That is all. :P

Edited by KR4-GTR
  • Replies 343
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

wish i saw this thread earlier but have been away for nye with limited net access.

believe it or not, i'm actually a real person, and a female. skype with me???? i'd love to formally give you the finger for calling me a guy.

i'm a close friend of chris and i also even went to melbourne to see the car wth him, even ask the seller!!!! i was there and you cant fake that.

i've also bought parts off chris and other people on the forum. you cant fake that either.

oh, and i still think you're an absolute dick head.

Edited by c-gtst

He didn't want to buy the BSB GTR for a reason, he said he disliked the color imperfections, he didn't buy it. WTF is the big deal?

Can we please move on and whoever does disaggree with KR4-GTR's choices, get the f.. out of this thread!

Marc

Hey GT-R32 can you please allow Chris Together with US (As you can see the followers on this Tread) are really Interested in this GTR Hunting Process.

I do apologize on behalf of this Tread if there is Any Inconvenience caused.

Please Kindly Leave this Tread if you are not interested in this Tread but looking at Disputing personal Preference.

I Wish you Luck with your Ride getting a New Owner :D

Chris, Please Disregard any further Comments from GT-R32 and continue with your GTR Hunting experience.

I am really sure that you currently have quite a few Fans looking at this Tread Daily and wanting to share your Joy and Experience throughout this process.

:PGo Chris Go! :banana:

Please let us know if you have any more updates on GTR 34 availables ... :iluvff:

Best Regards,

Andrew

I agree also we move and yes to go away gtr32 you add no valuue here there no reasoning wiuth you and narrow mind.

My narrow mind? You tried to defend him by saying what was uncovered about his edited picture using jpegsnoop was due to resizing - perhaps by the forum - this is flat out bullshit and ignores everything else (the time it was done and editing marks, all using photoshop). You also attempted to add clout by saying you did this for a living. If that isn't a partial view then I don't know what is.

Everyone else simply picking sides, can enjoy living in their own world of self deceit in the face of the facts, it's practically human to do so. Although it is a lesser way to live.

wish i saw this thread earlier but have been away for nye with limited net access.

believe it or not, i'm actually a real person, and a female. skype with me???? i'd love to formally give you the finger for calling me a guy.

i'm a close friend of chris and i also even went to melbourne to see the car wth him, even ask the seller!!!! i was there and you cant fake that.

i've also bought parts off chris and other people on the forum. you cant fake that either.

oh, and i still think you're an absolute dick head.

At what point did I say you weren't a girl or weren't a real person and how is that relevant? You went to Melbourne with him, so perhaps you are his girlfriend he speaks about with the Sonic Silver R33 GTST. Give the admitted closeness of the relationship, it's no wonder you're so quick to stick up for him.

Thanks for calling me an 'absolute dick head', an 'idiot' previously (when I was actually correct at the time) and wanting to give me 'the finger'. What a classy girl.

Some of you people really ought to leave the emotion out of it. Why did Chris lie about using photoshop at all when the picture was questioned, then later change his story again to admit to resizing the picture using the said program prior to posting it? Because it was later exposed it was done minutes prior to him posting it and the original was two weeks old. Why resize it at all and more to the point, why were other tools used - chrominance, luminance, lino use (photoshop's paint brush!), etc? Because he edited it to support an aggressively negative story.

Now we all realise the facts, you can move on with your thread. Just keep your tongue and other morally questionable behaviour in check, Chris. It eventually bites back at you.

GTR32 would you SHUT UP you already look like an douchebag and are just makiing it worse. Nobody believes you, now go off and destroy other threads.

+1 for moving on from this dick head, also been following this thread with great interest.

Edited by 288

When you resave a file in photoshop especially with reduced quality from high 12 to 9 (which i can see occurred in this instance and is commonly practised to reduce file size), it will certainly slightly auto change the images luminance etc etc from its default values, but will not result in the image in question.

In the sellers post earlier he even stated clearly to us all why in the picture the area in the back is darker with the shading from the pole in the garage and it makes sense. I've seen that car in person around melbourne city, it is definately two shades of blue and any picture of it should indicate this, but that is a bad picture and in person its not as bad.

I'd also like to mention aswell that KR4GTR's image in this thread GTR32 posted ( http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Wo...et-t273696.html ) is only simple blending and that picture is very amateur (sorry to insult you KR4GTR, but it looks pretty bad lol) just look how flat the image of the engine is. I read further up KR4GTR even stated to you that he could only do simple things like this in photoshop.

This post is not intended as an invitation back to GTR32. I hope he is gone for good now because its time to move on. I'm eagerly awaiting the return of KR4GTR with more valuable GTR hunt details which will also assist me in my search, please dont stop. You still around?

Edited by 20b3
Ok back on track, anyone chasing a modified midnight purple 34?

Click here

oooo they bought a global car... interesting.....

hmm... looking at the topspec site, they've bought a lot of global cars it seems...

I've been watching this thread and have been hunting for a GTR myself. I've been sent the original from the seller mid december and that picture posted by KR4-GTR has been edited. I ran what GTR32 said in post #272 to really check and its even more obvious. It's not really fair of you all to blast the guy for pointing out the truth!!

I was also sent the same picture by the seller early december and it was extremely dark in the back, just like KR4's post shows. For completeness sake ill even try and dig it up so you can run it through your fancy program.

And that other guy deserved to get blasted because this is not the proper forum to voice opinions about other members its about importing and besides I THOUGHT WE MOVED ON HERE?

Edited by 288

as we shift into the new decade....global warming is an issue,the financial crissis is real,cars no longer have steering wheels( thought control)....and this guy is still kicking tyres :bunny:

as we shift into the new decade....global warming is an issue,the financial crissis is real,cars no longer have steering wheels( thought control)....and this guy is still kicking tyres :)

sell him your R then Troy :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...