Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok..... after hearing my boss's VL turbo fluter the other night i couldn't help my self.... so i pulled the vacume tube off the bov and there is was nice loud flutter. pluged up the vacume tube with a bold and it was done.

now what i want to ask is does this effect my performance. it feels as if my acceleration is pretty crappy through 1st and second compared to what it used to be.... but that just might be me trying to find problems.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/
Share on other sites

hah

last night my mate said we should unplug the hose that goes into the factory bov and block it off so we get the 'flutter noise', well it did give the flutter noise. but this morning when i drove my car and i realise the difference, it is slower. 1st and 2nd gear takes longer to hit the high rev marks and also the pull has dropped.

i was wondering this myself this morning, thought it may have just been myself ;

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-601621
Share on other sites

Hybrid BOV and had it set to flutter under about 3000 rpm.. all seems good...

The guy from GFB said flutter isn't as bad as people say it is and you can tell that from cars that where around woth turbos when they didn't come with BOVs...

He said an average turbo's life expectancy is 100,000km's and you won't effect that really...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-601635
Share on other sites

I've got some mixed reports about this trick. 2 of my mates that have done it said they've actually gained some response, while me and another mate have actually lost some response when doing this mod. I guess whatever works and what you're happy with :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-601636
Share on other sites

its called compressor surge, its from the pressure running back through the turbo, as the bov is not functioning.

This slows the compressor wheel down, and thus your turbo has to work that little bit harder when you shift.

it can effect the lifespan of your turbo, but nothing drastic. but BOV's are there for a reason, so it would be best to keep it connected.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-601698
Share on other sites

Ball Bearing turbos dont like compressor surge at all, as there is less contact area between the shaft and the Core of the turbo, compared to a bushed turbo (T03s-T04s) that has 100% contact at all times.

A mate of mine is a die-hard VLT fan, and loves the High-pitch sqeelch of compressor surge "AKA Cooler noise" that echos for a couple of blocks.

He also loves GT series turbos (GT40s) witch happen to be ball bearing turbos. He has learnt this lesson the expensive way by, having to replace 2 GT40 Cores (And still counting) and spending over $2400 on new cores. Due to the turbo failing under excisive compressor surge. (@30PSI+)

Obviously you cant argue the fact that Nissan has spent millions of dollars on R&D and thought that a B.O.V would be benificial.

And they are!

They increase spool times, decrease's (Yes, even cars with BOVs fitted will still surge slightly) compressor surge, and some people that have them ATMO Vented like the PSHH sound.

Bottem line:

You cant improve on factory (Nissan put a BOV there because there reasearch & dev team thought that it would benifit the motors: reliabilty, performance or durability) . Use logic, anything over 15PSI i would be making sure i had a BOV.

my 2c

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-601920
Share on other sites

Its funny when u see a VLT put a bit of acceleration at the lights and not move and make a loud flutter noise.

Then you look at the guy and think to yourself, go the comperssor surge!!!!

Love the damage is probablty doing to the blades and the compressor wheel ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-604507
Share on other sites

Coming from a Car with no bov (my cefiro) and fitting a R32 factory BOV atmo venting at the moment, I can tell you that anyone who says bovs are not a performance mod can bite my ass.

I can change gears now and have the boost where I left it not wait half an hour for the bloody turbo to spool again.

The flutter was ok, but I prefer my psscht.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-604537
Share on other sites

I am not going to put my opinion on if flutter is bad or not..

But I will tell you how to fix the slow spool up.

I am guessing that what you did was simply take the vacuum hose on the top of the bov off and block off both sides..

this is not enough.

you need to take the bov off the pipe (2 bolts) and completely block off that hole under it so that NO air goes to the bov at all.

then you will have your flutter and FAST spool up when accelerating.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29417-is-flutter-good/#findComment-604566
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...