Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all.

Today I went to Winton for the second time with my S14. It has R33 GTS-T brakes all round with stock rotors and QFM A1RM pads all round.

The last time I came and for the first two sessions today the brakes were great however around half way through the day my pedal started going soft and then began to studder. I came into the pits and had a look at the front discs. They were dark and had heaps of pad material spread over them. The near new (at the start of the day) front QFM pads were now down to indicators. The backs however were fine.

Now it looks to me that I've gotten these things way too hot. I was doing a warmup lap, 2-3 hot laps, then a cool down lap, then another flyer then retuning to the pits with another cooldown lap. Is this too much for a pad like this to handle?

Looking around various forums these seem to be advertised for basic track work. Should I be warming them up or cooling them down differently? My car is lighter than an R33 so someone running them on an R33 would have bigger issues I'd imagine.

For the record the splash guards have been removed however I have not made any custom ducting yet. (Apart from the stock air guides on the caster rods) There are also no shims/backing plates/etc on the pads and I'm running Motul RBF600.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/294727-overheating-pads-qfm-a1rm/
Share on other sites

I had same problem, new A1RM's up front lasted 80mins with the big UAS GTR brake air deflectors: (more details: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...&p=4903262# ). This is what jetpilot had to say on the issue: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/-t...t&p=4909159

You've done nothing wrong. If you don't have a light/low powered car they really aren't up to the task, particularly on a track with reasonably big stops like winton.

I would look at something with a higher temp rating that is more targeted towards track work. The comment about switching pads for street/track is bullshit btw. Project Mu HC+ are about the best street/track pad you will find. They aren't the nicest things on the street (they will squeel at low speed and light brake applications and they don't feel great when cold but still pull you up ok) but you will not overheat them on the track and they will last a lot of track days. As a bonus they give a lot of feed back and feel pretty good too.

I've seen comments about excessively high rotor wear but haven't seen it on stock nissan rotors (on a mates car) or on my SCR pro's. I got 8 full days out of my last set of HC+ pads with about a years street driving before that. My mate has probably done more than 8 days on his by now. Neither of us are particularly slow.

Local suppliers are currently listing lower prices than yahoo for a change. Dunno if it just hasn't been updated or they bought bulk stock during the 100Y-$ times.

http://www.project-mu.com.au/en/products/pad_hcplus.php

http://hioctaneracing.com.au/eshop/product...roducts_id=1145

I just got the QFM A1RM's and they went well at sandown. Greg was very helpful and delivery was only 2 days.

Very cheap for $130. I don't think I'll be spending big on pads again after how they performed at Sandown.

I will monitor the wear but I get to about 220kmh before jumping on the brakes and they felt similar to my DS2500's.

^^This is what I thought^^ and my car would weigh about the same as an S14.

I have RDA slotted and dimpled 310mm rotors.

Sandown has much more heavy braking than winton too. Maybe more cool down on the straights though...

Strange. Don't know what I was doing! It's on both sides of the car and all four pads so I doubt its sticky pistons.

I did a 1:41.8 and the car has 220rwkw ish.

I'll keep you updated as I go. I'll have a look to see how much mine are worn after yesterday. (My first day on them)

How did you bed them in? how many laps do you reckon?

I bed mine in over about 3 laps and then leant on them pretty hard and they were fine.

As I said in that post that Moodles quoted, the A1RM is a street pad, capable of light track work. It's not a dedicated track pad. If you want to do serious track work, step up to something like the QFM Comp 9, $179 per axle set, and is a Ferodo DS3000 equivalent pad. As apposed to the A1RM which would be a Ferodo DS2500 equivalent pad....

I would look at something with a higher temp rating that is more targeted towards track work

That's not correct. Cast iron goes through a significant structural change at 723°C. If your rotors get hotter than that, they'll be quite a different material when they cool down. In technical terms, they'll be "fscked". Google for "iron phase diagram" for more details.

It's all quite irrelevant anyway, because it's uncommon to get rotors really glowing (=around 600°), even on a track. Claims beyond that are pissing into the wind.

The thermographic paints like what DBA use on their high-series rotors are a good idea. They tell you what temperature your rotors have been, not what temperature they are now. http://www.dba.com.au/2006/techdocs/T027.asp . Note that they don't bother measuring rotor temperature over 630°; if you get that kind of rotor core temperature your discs are rooted - that's probably getting to the magic 723° in the rotor cheeks. So... what's the point of a friction material that's "rated" higher than that?

So just be weary about what benefits you're getting from a pad that claim to work far higher than any rotor will physically get. Track pads don't have sky high temp ratings, and if they do, they've simply started a pissing contest with their competitors... What track pads are is a heavier duty versions of compounds designed to withstand sustained heat. The A1RM is a great cross over pad, but if you're serious about track work, step up to something like the Comp 9.

What would define as 'serious track work' though? It's a street trimmed S14 on Semis doing no more than 3 hot laps in a session.

I might leave these on the back and look into a better pad for the front. (Off to Japan in 2 weeks so might grab some Mus while I'm there)

As I said in that post that Moodles quoted, the A1RM is a street pad, capable of light track work. It's not a dedicated track pad. If you want to do serious track work, step up to something like the QFM Comp 9, $179 per axle set, and is a Ferodo DS3000 equivalent pad. As apposed to the A1RM which would be a Ferodo DS2500 equivalent pad....

That's not correct. Cast iron goes through a significant structural change at 723°C. If your rotors get hotter than that, they'll be quite a different material when they cool down. In technical terms, they'll be "fscked". Google for "iron phase diagram" for more details.

It's all quite irrelevant anyway, because it's uncommon to get rotors really glowing (=around 600°), even on a track. Claims beyond that are pissing into the wind.

The thermographic paints like what DBA use on their high-series rotors are a good idea. They tell you what temperature your rotors have been, not what temperature they are now. http://www.dba.com.au/2006/techdocs/T027.asp . Note that they don't bother measuring rotor temperature over 630°; if you get that kind of rotor core temperature your discs are rooted - that's probably getting to the magic 723° in the rotor cheeks. So... what's the point of a friction material that's "rated" higher than that?

So just be weary about what benefits you're getting from a pad that claim to work far higher than any rotor will physically get. Track pads don't have sky high temp ratings, and if they do, they've simply started a pissing contest with their competitors... What track pads are is a heavier duty versions of compounds designed to withstand sustained heat. The A1RM is a great cross over pad, but if you're serious about track work, step up to something like the Comp 9.

Hang on, lets just clarify:

Your now claiming the A1RM is a street/light track pad (with a temp rating of 0-780 degrees?) and anything with a sky high rating is just a pissing contest between manufacturers?

And that rotors shouldn't go over 723 degrees anyway? "So... what's the point of a friction material that's "rated" higher than that?" I hear you say...hmm, better re assess that 780 degree rated street pad i was considering.

You recommend these pads for just about everything yet you never give a straight answer when someone has an issue. You answer with positive spin.

I'm actually genuinely interested to know the reason for the rapid wear some people are experiencing. I'm also interested to know, in general terms, how many track days people are getting out of a set so i can determine if they actually are a bargain, or if they are buying 3 sets to every 1 of a more expensive pad.

Russman, I'm interested in your feedback

Here's some pics by the way. I left them at full resolution so you can see details easily. Assumed most people have a decent internet connection these days. :(

Front:

http://www.users.on.net/~logon/cars/progress/DSC00875.JPG

http://www.users.on.net/~logon/cars/progress/DSC00876.JPG

http://www.users.on.net/~logon/cars/progress/DSC00877.JPG

Rear:

http://www.users.on.net/~logon/cars/progress/DSC00879.JPG

Hang on, lets just clarify:

Your now claiming the A1RM is a street/light track pad

Yes, and always have.

anything with a sky high rating is just a pissing contest between manufacturers?

Correct. If you think a 'track' specific pad that's rated to 900-1000 degrees C, if ever going to see it, then you need to do some serious analysis to what happens to rotors LONG before that temperature... Top temp rating is not what defines whether a pad will withstand track work or not. There's a reason why rotor thermal paints never show more than 630 degrees.

You recommend these pads for just about everything

No, we recommend these pads as a Ferodo DS2500 equivalent. That is, a 100% streetable pad, that will withstand light track work. And that's what they are.

If you're willing to run a pad that's less ideal for street use, that is, higher rotor wear, more noise, less cold bite etc. then there are pads above A1RM, like Comp 9 and 12 for the front, and Comp 2 and 6 for the rear. The Comp pads are $179 per axle set front or rear, or alternatively we can also supply Project Mu HC+ for $309 per front axle set. But we'll always recommend the A1RM first to people, because anything higher than that starts to become a compromise on the street.

did you bed them in?

i found they last and perform much better if you go out hard for two laps when they are new (no track day before), come in.

let em cool for as long a possible. then go out again.

there is a HUGE difference.

if you heat em up and dont let cool from new (no track day before), you get the shudder and blue around the rotor. i did this the first time

only got 3 track days. the last set did 4 i think, had another day left.

oh ive got a 33 with 324mm uas caliper adapters and standard calipers. did sd last saturday 30+ deg outside. no pad problems.

oh and the uas air deflectors and no backing plate/ dust covers.

Hang on, lets just clarify:

Your now claiming the A1RM is a street/light track pad (with a temp rating of 0-780 degrees?) and anything with a sky high rating is just a pissing contest between manufacturers?

And that rotors shouldn't go over 723 degrees anyway? "So... what's the point of a friction material that's "rated" higher than that?" I hear you say...hmm, better re assess that 780 degree rated street pad i was considering.

You recommend these pads for just about everything yet you never give a straight answer when someone has an issue. You answer with positive spin.

So at least its not just me who has noticed!

Looks like the only people who see through some of the claims are those genuinely need a very high performance pad ie. not many of us. Meanwhile, the majority are ready to shoot the non believers down since they dont know any better.

I think jetpilots claims are more realistic nowadays, but plenty of questionable information has already been spread.

Personally I think temp ratings for pads are useless since there are rubbish performance pads that make big claims.. Although, would it be correct to assume the pad gets hotter than the disk? If so, then high temp ratings for pads might not be that silly if they ratings are comparable and realistic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...