Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , someone hinted that Vipecs V44 may be made available with high current injector drivers in the near future . Any news of this and no not interested in a V88 for a four cylinder .

Cheers Adrian .

have not heard anything yet.

I would have thought that these should have been optional . I don't imagine its possible to get a V88 with only half the coil and injector drivers fitted .

Anyway with the injector driver box , does this give you the real peak and hold electrics or is it just the botched resistors system ?

Cheers A .

  • 6 months later...

This is now available.

The new V44 wire in ecu can support low imp injectors. (Vi-Pec only option) not available with the storm.

Also the new firmware is great! I have wired up my font ABS sensor as a digital wheel speed input to calculate %slip and run tables for traction control!

New software is out also.

Dude, you must be a sad person trying to dig for failures on the net regarding the Vipec to post it here. It is not Vipec that made your mother not hug you enough, let it go...

Dude, you must be a sad person trying to dig for failures on the net regarding the Vipec to post it here. It is not Vipec that made your mother not hug you enough, let it go...

BIGmikespec, you havn't noticed i'm having a bit of fun here !!! the more you bite the more a I laugh !! I love all the vipec/link/rayhall fanboi's

ever since dirtgarage/foxy start the ranting about how good vipec was, and how it was going to dominate all in it's way ??? and all the motec is sh!t talk ??

then in for sale section i read that he's installed motec in his car ?????

$50K with all the latest updates since (MoTeC M800, custom loom, sensors etc...loom was done by Robbo who does a lot of the V8 Supercar teams...pretty much the best in the business $7500 worth)

ummmmmmmmm please after all the crap i read about how good vipec is he upgrades to a motec ???? NO not and inferior product

any way have a nice day

Dude, you must be a sad person trying to dig for failures on the net regarding the Vipec to post it here. It is not Vipec that made your mother not hug you enough, let it go...

:ermm: good call. He might need some hugs, one guy was asking about a issue after a firmware update for a DI he had setup??? and then this?

*shakes head* the shit people post on the internet.. gotta love it.

Sorry mate Monday mornings, nothing personal.

I contacted Paul about that; he told me it was for the logging software that the M800 offered compared to the Vipec which is still developing with time. He has no reason to BS to me so take it for what it is worth.

Anyway, nice day will be had, same to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...