Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Based on that natsoft link,

Outright:

David Empringham Sierra Sierra Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 1:32.2480

K Sasaki Pan Speed Racing Mazda RX-7 1:32.4540

Tarzan Yamada CyberEVO Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 1:32.4940

Open:

Steve Glenney Pulse Racing Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 1:36.4980

John Boston Insight Motorsports/Elias Auge Honda S2000 1:40.2880

Jason Hart Ultimate Tunes Subaru Imprezza WRX 1:40.4400

Clubsprint:

Nicholas Kalis Nicholas Kalis Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 1:44.8850

Duncan Forrest Duncan Forrest Nissan R35 GTR 1:45.0090

Jason Naidoo Jason Naidoo Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 1:45.0260

Fastest RWD:

K Sasaki Pan Speed Racing Mazda RX-7 1:32.4540

Kinoshita Mitsuhiro Pro Staff R-Magic Motorsport Mazda RX-7 1:33.5050

Warren Luff Prep'd Motorsport Lotus Elise 1:33.5520

Fastest FWD:

Benny Tran Benny Tran Honda Civic 1:41.2360

John Boston Insight Motorsports/MTA Plus Honda Civic 1:42.0200

Sam Stratten J's Racing/JDM Concept Honda Integra Type R 1:51.4120

Fastest NA:

Mal Rose Mal Rose Racing Holden Commodore 1:39.3230

Benny Tran Benny Tran Honda Civic 1:41.2360

John Boston Insight Motorsports/MTA Plus Honda Civic 1:42.0200

(Yes, i'm at work :P )

Edited by Leif
Based on that natsoft link,

Outright:

David Empringham Sierra Sierra Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 1:32.2480

K Sasaki Pan Speed Racing Mazda RX-7 1:32.4540

Tarzan Yamada CyberEVO Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 1:32.4940

Open:

Steve Glenney Pulse Racing Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 1:36.4980

John Boston Insight Motorsports/Elias Auge Honda S2000 1:40.2880

Jason Hart Ultimate Tunes Subaru Imprezza WRX 1:40.4400

Clubsprint:

Nicholas Kalis Nicholas Kalis Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 1:44.8850

Duncan Forrest Duncan Forrest Nissan R35 GTR 1:45.0090

Jason Naidoo Jason Naidoo Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 1:45.0260

Fastest RWD:

K Sasaki Pan Speed Racing Mazda RX-7 1:32.4540

Kinoshita Mitsuhiro Pro Staff R-Magic Motorsport Mazda RX-7 1:33.5050

Warren Luff Prep'd Motorsport Lotus Elise 1:33.5520

Fastest FWD:

Benny Tran Benny Tran Honda Civic 1:41.2360

John Boston Insight Motorsports/MTA Plus Honda Civic 1:42.0200

Sam Stratten J's Racing/JDM Concept Honda Integra Type R 1:51.4120

Fastest NA:

Mal Rose Mal Rose Racing Holden Commodore 1:39.3230

Benny Tran Benny Tran Honda Civic 1:41.2360

John Boston Insight Motorsports/MTA Plus Honda Civic 1:42.0200

(Yes, i'm at work :P )

Sorry to correct you but yamadas time was set in the wrx. The evo has not lapped yet.

Oh, sorry about that. I thought there might be a couple of mistakes, I just went off the website. I'm told Benny Tran's civic is Supercharged too, not NA.

Does anyone have details on the Pulse Racing Evo that is leading open class? To be four seconds clear of the pack is an amazing effort!

i was lucky enough to get out there for the last pro session to see quite a few of the fastest laps.

Very very impressive.

I think i'm in love with the panspeed rx7 now. It was incredibly tidy through 9,10 and 11. And sounded porn too.

Big Show is so hard on the gear, I hope he can get the old girl back out there!

Whats the bet someone else is doing all the work on the car? Lol!

well it wont be Wooster. he'd be off getting late's for everyone. :P

im keen to see some of the times thus far of the locals to see how they are stacking up.

the panspeed rx7, as has been said before, is an awesome bit of gear.... everything about it is so neat and well presented.

shame to hear about the big 34. hope its all good tomorrow.. definately looked the goods in the few laps that it did.

and where was the greddy monster sale?? or is it on tomorrow??

also... the blue 180sx with the ce28's... is that S13deviat??? that thing is a really nice bit of gear.. loved it through 9, 10 and 11.. more composed than most of the cars... especially the gtr's.. floppy mongrels they are..

cheers

Linton

there is some photos on NS with the s15 that crashed into the wall, sorry sight to see but don't know how long they will be up for

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...0131&st=280

here is praying for a nice day tomorrow weather wise, it's not looking good if you look at the FC but they never get it right as they said today would rain.

Very happy with a 1:50:3

I'm loving the track. Started with a 59, then a 52 and then 50. More in it tomorrow I hope. And if it stays dry.

Loving the event!!!

The High octane guys were still working when we left about 8pm. Poor guys...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...