Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hope you guys can help me.

I have a 1994 r33 gtst rb25 with a full 3inch exhaust, greddy profec2 boost controler and K and N filter running 100 octane fuel with stock smic. I have bosch 040 fuel pump. On 10 or 12psi the car ran well but over a period of 2 weeks it began to misfire and develop flat spots.

I have recently replaced the platinum plugs 1.1m with a set of NGK bcr6es coppers gapped at 0.8. I have also siliconed up my coil packs as well.

The car runs really smooth all the way to redline with out misfires or flat spots, even at 12psi. The problem is that the car feels alot less responsive in power delivery, smoother but slower in acceleration. Could the problem be the gap on the plugs or the fact that they are cheap coppers. Im thinking that the spark in the chamber is alot smaller causing less of an ignition and thus killing some power. What do the experts think.

Ideally i want it running as hard as before with the smoothness and lack of misfire it has at present.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/299330-spark-plug-problem-in-rb25/
Share on other sites

Hey manuel im no expert unfortunately..... Um so even with the less responsive power delivery do you think you have actually lost maximum power in the car or....?

Um I think that gapping your plugs to 0.8mm should give you a faster ignition so the only thing I could think of is that the timing is slightly out. Maybe its firing slightly earlier and not at its best position. But I knew someone who gapped it to around 0.8mm aswell and he thought he had a slight increase in power with similar mods to yours. Like I said I no expert I'm just throwing up some ideas.

"waits for someone to correct me"

"6" heat range should be fine, considering the factory spec is a "5".

The gap has no effect on the "speed" of ignition, so the timing will not be affected to any significant degree. The type of plug is pretty much irrelevant. Pt plugs are used standard because they require less maintenance and a longer replacement interval than Cu plugs. In all other respects, they are the same - they simply provide a facility to ignite the fuel / air mixture inside the combustion chamber.

Try opening the gap out to, say, 1mm. This should provide a stronger spark, and therefore a better burn of the fuel/air mixture.

Or maybe you are just used to the power delivery, and there is no problem at all.

Sorry 'blind elk' I think my term of faster was a little misleading. I was told by a 'performance' mechanic that when increasing the boost in the car and making more power you should decrease the gap of the plugs to give you a more reliable spark especially at higher RPM? So I was thinking that with a larger gap the plug had the tendency to possible 'miss' or be delayed slightly due to the speed of everything at higher RPM's and thinking logically, smaller distance = quicker time to get there. As I said im no expert just throwing an idea. After all this forum is a place to learn something for us noob's haha

After doing a little reading I do agree with your point of getting a stronger spark and better burn at a larger gap.

you are correct in what you say about the smaller gap giving a more reliable spark. a bigger gap at higher boost can result in the spark being blown out, so to speak.

blind elk is correct though about a bigger gap being better. the bigger gap means there is a bigger.... lets go with fire front. the spark has a bigger surface area when arcing across so is able to ignite more fuel in it's duration. will it result in more power though? not enough to notice unless you were running seriously rich, but that would also make the bigger spark less reliable.

as for the feeling of a loss in power, has the weather been hotter when you are feeling the loss of power? that will make a big difference in power, especially with a SMIC. in summer the stock cooler will suffer from heat soak extremely quickly at 12psi, resulting in a loss of power. you could probably drop the boost to 10psi and not lose much power on a hot day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah ok. I seem to be mixing it like everyone else does so not sure what's happening. Will experiment with it more.
    • Depends on what you mean by OK. First up, was this done cold or hot? Are they reasonably consistent? Yes, they are reasonably consistent. Could be better. But unless it has had a build at some point, it is a ~30 year old engine and you'd expect some variation. Some of the difference could also be in user technique Is it good compression? Well....not numerically, no. New they were >160 psi. The one at 140 would be fine, in that context. If they were all ~140, you'd be reasonably happy. But the one that is @120 is twice as far down from the original numbers as the one @ 140. But.. (again)... technique can play a part in the absolute magnitude of these numbers, and the quality/state of repair/accuracy of the pressure gauge is not known. In the context of the above, the compression tester that was used last on my car is regularly compared to a known good pressure gauge. Not calibrated, exactly, but compared to a reference instrument that is not used for any other purpose, so cops no abuse. So we can trust the measurements off that tester. But another tester in the same workshop wasn't being compared against the standard and was reading a good 30ish psi lower. When you're reading 100 psu but the engine is really doing 130, you can make bad decisions.
    • More likely from tiny bubbles in the filler/putty. Maybe be less aggressive when mixing it. Perhaps invest in a vacuum chamber to pull the air bubbles out?** **I don't know if this is a thing for body filler. I see hardcore epoxy makers degassing their mixed resin on the regular.
    • IIRC, the speedo on these is fed from the sensor in/on the snout of the diff.
    • They were. I bought the AWD for experimenting but racing it would disqualify or disadvantage me from a few race classes. Def getting a FWD for racing.
×
×
  • Create New...