Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi - I have a car that I want to do something different to and one of my options is AWD Nissan RB motor. What I would like to know is what is the best (ie; cheapest and easiest) way of getting an AWD setup ? I have good cash flow but no good at saving so can't afford much more than about $2k at atime. I am initially not after power, but more worried about getting the AWD conversion done even if it is just with an NA motor and then upgrade later.

Is any of the RB motors any better over the others (ignoring the obvious benefits of displacement) - I noticed RB20's are getting over 200kw quite easily and that will probably be enough for me to start with.

Is it worth picking up AWD bits separately, eg transmission, sump/diff and front suspension or will that end up costing me too much in the long run ? Do you need a dedicated AWD ECU or wiring harness or can a RWD car be set up for AWD easily ?

What about the VL Commodore motors - are they just a Nissan RB motor or did Holden do any mods to them - that might be a cheaper way to start ?

Thanks

Nissan AWD systems in the RB-engined vehicles work by a lot of electronics and hydraulics. There are numerous threads asking similar question - converting RWD Nissans to AWD, so do a search.

If you are intent on using a Nissan engine, then you may need to look at the Patrol series.

Ok well it seems like you are new to rb motors etc

rb30 - VL commodore - Single Cam engine - Not too great unless you plan on doing some work to it or a twin cam conversion

rb26 - from the twin turbo gtr (not the newest one) - It is a twin turbo engine ready to rock and roll for 4wd - Revs very nicely BUT it bloody expensive

rb25 - from the 33 gtst usually. Its only a single turbo - Found in GTS-4 aswell - Makes ok power from stock but not as much as 26. Can't rev like a 26 or a 20 either

rb20 - mainly just r32 gtst and in some gts4 - Makes lowish power but revs very nicely - Also a single turbo

That is just a ridiculously basic run down of some of the motor. That is excluding which have VCT, which are fuel injected or carby if its a neo engine or normal if it has solid lifters of hydraulic etc etc

If you on a budget get the stuff from a GTS4 with the rb25. That is definately your cheapest bet. Maybe just buy a smashed to pieces skyline or something. You will need an ecu to control it all. Also like I said dont put in the rb30 unless you want to twin cam it first. Anyways I would write more but I need to go to work. Wiki the different engines and have a search on here. There is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much info on this dam website. Its a gold mine honestly.

Cheers

Lukas

There is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much info on this dam website. Its a gold mine honestly.

Cheers

Lukas

Thanks for the info - nice and simple explanantion.

I did have a search but there is toooooooo much info and could take me months to find what I was specifically looking for.

Thanks for the info - nice and simple explanantion.

I did have a search but there is toooooooo much info and could take me months to find what I was specifically looking for.

hahaha yes I know that feeling. What is the engine etc going to be used for? Swing through a little more info :cheers:

so you're talking about converting a standard road-going RWD car to AWD?

take the GTS-4 .. if you use the whole drivetrain then you are looking at using the standard front diff located in the sump, then those front drive shafts need to go somewhere, so your looking at replacing your front hub/rotor/wheel/suspension assembly.

the rear drivetrain can be taken care of by a custom drive shaft to the vehicle's std rear diff (see hardy spicer).

i had considered doing an AWD conversion to a RWD car but seriously the thought of trying to fabricate all the frond end suspension components... it will be costly and time consuming

so you're talking about converting a standard road-going RWD car to AWD?

take the GTS-4 .. if you use the whole drivetrain then you are looking at using the standard front diff located in the sump, then those front drive shafts need to go somewhere, so your looking at replacing your front hub/rotor/wheel/suspension assembly.

the rear drivetrain can be taken care of by a custom drive shaft to the vehicle's std rear diff (see hardy spicer).

i had considered doing an AWD conversion to a RWD car but seriously the thought of trying to fabricate all the frond end suspension components... it will be costly and time consuming

Spot on - excpet I plan on using the entire front and rear suspensions, crossmembers, hubs, brakes etc and mounting them to the RWD chassis. Just have to find an AWD setup that will make this possible in terms of ease and cost.

GTS-4 are RB25 and AWD ? That could be a goer.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...