Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just to clarify for you ryan.

kpgc10 = skyline gtr (1969-1972)

p510 = bluebird (1968-1973)

Both very nice cars :) .

i know. P510 were also our datsun 1600's. I had two.

I was just pointing it out for other memebers who might not know the REAL cars, before it all turned to PLASTIC!

This is what its supposed to pay homage to...

2225106432_7f087e14bf.jpg

personally I reckon this rendition just takes a big steaming dump before dancing a merry jig on the image of the classic.

wow that front just makes it look like its got a lift kit or something.

now there's an idea... a stagea crossover model, like that shitty BMW X3. lift kit and offroader wheels.

I think the only decent KPGC front graft I've ever seen was on a C33 laurel or something.

wow that front just makes it look like its got a lift kit or something.

now there's an idea... a stagea crossover model, like that shitty BMW X3. lift kit and offroader wheels.

Have seriously considered raising one and seeing if we cud fit some 4wd tyre's in there like the old subaru wagons, the rear would be easy but the front is way to hard with the diff in the sump. But man imagine it on the beach.

fixed :)

drive an 850kg car, with a "decent" SR or FJ, say high 200rwkws, its a shorter wheelbase, look front on at the extra width of a skyline from the roof to the ground- the doors are much thicker than on old cars.

In old, light cars, you have a lot more feel through the steering wheel, pedals etc, and you dont have a foot between your shoulder and the outside world, you have an inch, so it seems less disconnected, then factor in weight, wheelbase, power etc, becomes a lot of fun :ninja:

drive an 850kg car, with a "decent" SR or FJ, say high 200rwkws, its a shorter wheelbase, look front on at the extra width of a skyline from the roof to the ground- the doors are much thicker than on old cars.

In old, light cars, you have a lot more feel through the steering wheel, pedals etc, and you dont have a foot between your shoulder and the outside world, you have an inch, so it seems less disconnected, then factor in weight, wheelbase, power etc, becomes a lot of fun :)

pffffft, buy an exige and turbocharge it? :)

Edited by pyro-ns

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...