Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I just realise something about my AFM (mine S2). I compared the code with S1 GTST and found that S1 code is J60 and mine is E60. And also theres no Nissan logo on it. What does it mean? Does it really make any difference? I also realise the sticker on my AFM is green in color whereas most are pink. Can anybody help?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30297-any-difference-between-s1-and-s2-afm/
Share on other sites

For R33's, I know of 2 types of AFM... My mate with a 93 (Series 1) has one with 5 wires in the plug. Mine is a S1 '95 and it's got 3 wires. Aside from that, Just Jap charge $170 for the 5 wire and $250 for the 3 wire :P

Can't say if they're compatable or not, but I think I heard once that it may have something to do with the older AFM being able to self-clean... Don't quote me on that though :)

series 1 afms r green and series 2 r pink

someone must have replaced urs with a series 1 afm

If thats the case, I hv a friend who has a S1 and his AFM is pink so meaning someone must hv switch it then? And also even if my AFM has been switched, APEXi filters should still be able to fit according to APEXi but I can't seem to fit mine. Can you explain it to me? Thanx.

The difference are, as stated, a different plate, different plug.  

On top of those two differences the Series 1 AFM element does not reach all the way accross the opening.

Any difference in performance? I cant fit my Apexi filter and I'm thinking to change my AFM.

i have an apexi pod on mine... even tho now im sellin my afm

make sure ur usin a gasket and ur pod has a few holes.... make sure they r in a rectangle shape, otherwise u have the wrong apexi pod

mine also has 2 other holes i think

my mates 94 gtst has a pink afm also, which i thought was weird until i broke mine and relised how easy they r to break

i have an apexi pod on mine... even tho now im sellin my afm

make sure ur usin a gasket and ur pod has a few holes.... make sure they r in a rectangle shape, otherwise u have the wrong apexi pod

mine also has 2 other holes i think

my mates 94 gtst has a pink afm also, which i thought was weird until i broke mine and relised how easy they r to break

One of my mates has the same apexi filter I'm hving and he can just bolt it on. Mine doesnt seem to bolt straight on. My AFM is rectangle and has the mesh. So there must be something about my AFM. Does anyone has a green color sticker on his AFM ???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...