Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

maybe you drive it a bit different because you know you just put in shitter fuel?

Nope, drove it the same way. Didn't notice any difference in performance either

That's why I don't understand why.

I don't agree with the remove the O2 sensor mentality.

O2 sensor will insure optimal AFR, emisssions and fuel economy over a wide range of operating conditions, fuel variations ect. You can tune a car to run just as well under those conditions but drive the car on a different day cold morning hot humid afternoon use a poorer batch of fuel ect and it wont be perfect. The car will still run and drive ok but just not be quite as optimally well tuned.

OEM o2 sensors are now often used well beyond just light load and cruise often working well into high load conditions. Examples that I am aware of is some of the new cars require the following two conditions before going out of closed loop greater than 85% throttle and greater than 4000rpm between switching between closed and open loop. (Required to meet tough new euro standars)

For those not running a O2 sensor what do you gain by not having a O2. The only thing I can think of is not having the sensor in the exhaust potentially causing extra restriction which I would think is extremely minimal if not impossible to measure. And quite a few people in this thread have just disconnected there O2 sensor but still have it physically in the exhaust so where is the gain?

Mine is pretty poor!! I am getting about 19-21 L/100ks

I am ALWAYS at the petrol station!!!

:unsure: not so flash for the wallet

Wow, I thought I was bad. I get about 17-18L/100 km, which could be due to it running rich, but for the sake of the engine it might need to stay that way

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...