Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1991 R32 GTR - 80,000kms - KH2 Gunmetal Grey

Engine and drive train -

- Original matching number engine (verified)

- R34 late model injectors

- Mines cast alloy angles with brand new 4.5" K&N filters (original airbox inc)

- Custom made front mount oil cooler with earls braided lines. (also a custom made air-con condenser to fir next to the oil cooler)

- Genuine TRUST aftermarket front mount

- Tuned ECU

- Full TEIN adjuatable Coilover Suspension

- Aftermarket mandrel bent exhaust

- Nismo single plate clutch

- Very tight 2-way diff

- Original GTR brakes

- Front and rear adjustable strut braces

Car was recently tuned by RACEPACE, engine producing 400Hp (240wkw) which can be verified, does not burn or use a drop of engine oil or coolant!!!!!

Interior:

- Factory GTR bucket seats in good cond

- Factory Speakers and new cd player

- Nardi steering wheel

- Overall very very clean!!!

Exterior -

- Factory GTR N1 front bar

- Factory GTR N1 bonnet lip spoiler

- Standard GTR side skirts, rear bar and wing

- Factory forged R32 GTR wheels

- All original body panels!!!!

Overall this car is a very strong reliable car that will be worth money in time to come. The car has never been raced or tracked and can be easily driven every day unlike some other gtr's. If i dont get roughly the figure advertised the car can sit in the garage this is more so an EOI, selling due to purchasing a ute (may be interested in a swap for a maloo or a chev silverado ute). Located in VIC

$20,000 ono

will upload images later on in the week

Contact Paul on 0412 383 133 for more details

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/305466-1991-gunmetal-grey-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

240kw at the rears when your loosing approx 30% through your drive train means the engine is producing 420HP, just like the add states!!!!! please do not post rubbish in my thread if you cant read my add properly!!!!!!! And the add actually says 400 not 420 which it should!!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

for the interested people who called about the car last week, i smashed my phone over the weekend and lost everyone's numbers!!!! contact the number provided to arrange for a new time to view the car, thanks!

Edited by paulys
  • 2 weeks later...
no thanks mate im actually looking at buying a motorbike now. Price has been lowered again to 18,500 or will negotiate without a rwc as i just need it gone!!!!!

What sort of bike are you interested in? 2006 GSXR1000?

RWC not required as I'm interstate.

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...