Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They don't go on the other way.

No, but it is possible to get the mounts upside down on the brackets (difficult with the locating dowel, but not impossible).

My advice is to double and triple check everything as it seems your 25 sits higher than my 30 does!

yup go figure hey....

have triple checked everything... not the first time i have done a conversion so not a complete noob.. really got no idea why teh hell it sits so high..

thinking elongating holes and 20 rubber mounts is looking to be the best option

Something I did to lower the 30 a bit was redrill the holes in the bracket that bolts to the block, drilled them 15mm lower but just figure out how much clearance you have from sump to cross member and lower accordingly.

That still doesn't explain why it is sitting too high though... I prefer to find the problem rather than dodge around it :D

nope nothing is on the wrong side....

find it kinda difficult to do something wrong with it dude....

my thoughts are as previously stated with 3 different types of engine mounts i may have one that sits differently..

when i was speaking to a few mechanics (well known workshops) before i did the conversion they told me that its not uncommon for them to sit high for some reason and it just seems to vary from one to the otehr.. he didnt understand it either.

as i said previously i have tried using both combinations ie all 20 bits and all 25 bits...

both sit high... the strut brace sits on the intake plenum and sits around 10mm or so above the strut tower..

There is not 3 different engine mounts. There is 20 and 25, that is all. There are three different gearbox mount types but they are all the same anyway.

You are either doing something wrong or your strut brace is not meant to fit. Take a photo

thinks i will be getting the camera out.. given that the strut brace fit with the 20 in it pretty sure its meant to be fitting :P

and as previously stated.. have run both all 20 mounts and brackets and subframe adn the same with the 25... and mounts WERE installed correctly.. honestly there isnt much you can "stuff" up hey. unless i have somehow managed to leave a 20mm metal plate on my cross member :)

will take some pics tonight

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...