Jump to content
SAU Community

more rb20de hp!?


ANut
 Share

Recommended Posts

Extractors, Heatshield and cold air flow to ur pod, full exaust, after market engine managment, adjustable cam gears, cams. huge list dude, just depends on how deep ur pockets are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's always much more challenging (and expensive) to mod an N/A car sucessfully. As NA_R33 said, exhaust, extractors etc will give you a much better breathing engine, but I'd be very careful about choosing which products to use - a lot of the big bore aftermarket exausts will cause you to lose a lot of low end power/torque, which is exactly what you dont want...:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an example of what I said above, fujitsubo provide quite detailed info on all of their exhausts - here's what a typical power/torque graph looks like:

LegalisR_torque.jpg

Notice power and torque are way down under 3K rpm, but pick up and improve at higher revs. I'm not saying this is typical of all exhausts, but you do have to choose with care, especially with N/A...:)

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with all due respect, i have driven a R32 rb20de before with catback exhaust mod before... the car actually felt weaker. The torque is almost completely gone becos there's not enough back pressure for that push. dun forget that you are driving a heavy car that needs plenty of torque for that push. even for my car, rb25de, i felt a decrease in torque but gain abit of it back when i fitted in a silencer... its better balance now at both low and high end power.

my advise is just the air pod and thats it. any other mods like ecu or engine internals are waste of money, esp for an NA car.. trust me, i was in your shoes a while ago and decided to concentrate on the handling of the car instead... such as struts and sways, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. At my local circuit most of the N/A racers (civics mainly) always use a small bore exhaust to keep back pressure up. On my current car there is a definite difference in the bottom end power/torque when I add or remove the tail pipe baffle. Generally speaking, if you go for an aftermarket exhaust avoid anything too big and make sure it's designed/tuned for an N/A engine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a exhaust made up at my local place for my old GTS, was 2¼" and only had a (large) resonator near the front and a smallish muffler at the back and picked up about 8Kw at the wheels and lost no low down torque, picked up quite a bit in fact. However seeing some GTS's fit 2½" exhausts they did loose low end when redyno'd.. and that includes GTS25's.. but your only going to get fairly small gains no matter what you do in an N/A car... including PVA's suguestion of NOS as I don't think a RB20DE will handle much more than a 50hp shot???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

internal work is not required for a 70hp nos kit on a gts25 so i dont think 50hp on the 2 ltr would require ne. People have presumptions that nos destroys engines, when used properly, yes it puts more stress on the engine as with ne modifaction but actually allows the engine to run alot cooler due to the chemical reaction that goes on in the combustion chanber which is very benificial to engine.

Has nebody ever considered a computer capable of a dual fuel curve with extra injectors for methanol on the second curve, thereby allowing the engine to be leaned right out with out pinging due to the much cooler methanol running through the engine and giving a considerable power increase kinda of like not so illegal nos?? just a thought....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just do a search on it and see how it works. Basically the nos is broken down by the heat of the engine and when it is broken down it produces oxygen, as the reaction requires heat the process thereby draws heat out of the engine and therefor cools it down.

PVA_GLUE: Thats exactly what im saying, Obviously there will be more stress on the internals but the lower combustion temperatures kinda cancel it out, of course this is only when running relitivly small doses, say 50 to 75 hp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extractors for a RB25 will set back around the $2500 mark. Thats a rough price so call up, but it's not cheap as far as I know. I agree with the bigbore 3" zorst, unless your car can push out that much it can potentially drop the power levels.

Much like a front mount intercooler on a GTST vs the stock one. Because the air has travel much further it takes longer and looses pressure (aka pressure drop). Thus you may be required to run say 8psi instead of 6psi to get the same power than before you had front mount.

However yes the front mount will handle much more boost anything above 10psi whereas the stock may not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Butters I can't tell you why but the bigger HKS step 2 cams improved low and mid end immensely. Turbos started spooling about 1k RPM less than before and the idle/vacuum was rock solid, it was an absolute thrill to drive, 3rd gear pulls hit 180kmh where previously only managed 160. Conversely, the milder poncoms in there now have a funky idle making it harder to get off the line, drives poorly in lower revs, laggy and makes less power/torque throughout. Feels better after I swapped the EBC but unless I put it on the Dyno again, I can't say how much better.
    • Hi Sydney kid   do you still selling spring and blistein shocks for Nissan 260rs? Air any suspension upgrades? Please advice     yudy
    • Cams are not needed at this power level, they will create lag. The cam gears are a good idea though.
    • @Murray_Calavera yeah, I guessed as much, cooler temps, more boost, less knock, more timing, hello power. Unfortunately not quite within reach ATM, could upgrade my whole fuel system to support but still wouldn't have E85 to run it 😂  Anyway, I changed cams again, 260/260 poncam B and everything else the same except an EBC upgrade. Now I must say I was quite disappointed with the result as it was like running stock cams (didn't try to dial them in as they're supposed to be optimum already) but after awhile I suspected my new EBC was underperforming not to mention difficult to use. I recently swapped back my old EBC and it drives much better now, boost comes on sooner, more stable, no spikes etc, feels all quicker and faster than with stock cams. Planning to fiddle with the cam gears and see what happens but maybe skip the Dyno as I intend to revert to the HKS cams cos they really made the car come alive; low and mid end was unbelievable and it just wanted to rev to the moon, finally knew what people were raving about, RB26 really loves revs. Anyway, Dyno 03 is quite disappointing, in Dyno 02 although peak power was less and trailed off at the top, the low and mid end improvement more than made up for it.
    • @Darrel It's so tempting to say e85 is borderline magic. It cools the intake charge, so if you're flirting with the edge of the turbos compressor map it helps dramatically cool down the hot air the turbos are pumping. It is very resistant to detonation so you can crank the timing, I don't really want to say you won't be knock limited anymore.... but you probably wont be knock limited anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if you made 20% more power swapping to e85 (provided you have the fuel system to support them, bigger injectors maybe bigger pump etc). 
×
×
  • Create New...