Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if i may jump on the bandwagon here...

my r32 gtst is running 15psi, through a no-name bleed valve, (was running 17psi with no dramas) and i dont get any of the missing/hesitation that some ppl have mentioned... Does this mean my ecu has been re-mapped?

standard turbo (hiflowed)

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How about setting the boost with the control arm to the wastegate and leaving it alone. Power is controlled by the right foot right ? Mine is set at 20psi and thats it. If its raining I don't nail it.

The only purpose I've seen so far for adjustable boost is so that when I beat a dude in a "traffic light grand prix" he can say "but I wasn't runniing full boost" or "I was only running 12psi" etc.

Oops, I can feel a flogging from Sydneykid coming :D

bleeders 'trick' the car into thinking it's still running 10psi while it's actually running, say, 12 etc....

That is exactly what a EBC does !!

It will bleed pressure out of the wastegate hose to increase boost, as well as (some do) stop any pressure going to the wastgate to eliminate wastegate creep.

Basically a EBC and a bleed both 'trick' the turbo/wastegate into generating more boost.

It's just that an EBC is usually more stable.

J

yah dont bypass the boost solinoid it doesn't like it. I tryed on mine and the dyno said something like this. bypass boost solinoid: 10PSI. fuel mix, 10 (ritch). power, not even 110KW at wheel.

with boost connected: 7PSI fuel mix, 12 (just right). power over 120KW at wheel. if you guys dont belive me try it. dont think you got more power untill you put it on a dyno. I hate those !^#@$%( that think boost is everything that makes a car go quick and that's all you need.

How about setting the boost with the control arm to the wastegate and leaving it alone.

This sounds like the answer i was looking for... are you saying i can have the standard wastegate adjusted for more boost? then the ecu remapped to suit?

Power is controlled by the right foot right ? Mine is set at 20psi and thats it. If its raining I don't nail it.

Here here!

WOOOHOOOO!!!

ok, now lets get technical...(not too technical though)...

I'm gonna have a dyno tune done in the upcoming months, can he do the retune on the ecu?

how do i adjust the wastegate (or how is it adjusted?)

"Oops, I can feel a flogging from Sydneykid coming"

No, on the contrary GTRman1992, if you read my past posts you would notice I agree with you. Multi stage boost controllers are a waste of money better spent on something that makes the car go faster, not slower. Like you, I use the throttle to control how fast I go. If I don't need full power, I don't push it down so far.

I'll get back to those turbos of yours in another post........

Yes, I can name at least three dudes I know who installed a turbo smart bleed valve and blew up there cars. You cannot just wind up the boost without considering a lot of other parameters. Best to set the boost with proper tune and leave it alone.

I look forward to continued discussion re my setup.

 

bleeders 'trick' the car into thinking it's still running 10psi while it's actually running, say, 12 etc....

Put your car on the dyno before playing with the boost. Not only will you be able to determine exactly what boost pressure your running, but also determine other things like fuel pump health which is almost paramount.

bleeders sux and so does the single solenoid avc-r. Get yourself a dual solenoid ebc like a profc b spec 2

I could be wrong but dont most electronic boost controllers 'pulse' the signal hence making the top of a boost curve like a sine wave? A bleed valve just lets it flow with less turbulence?

I believe that BMT took the HKS EVC off the Endless R32 to make way for a $150 bleeder. This is a car capable of running 10s....

The only purpose I've seen so far for adjustable boost is so that when I beat a dude in a "traffic light grand prix" he can say "but I wasn't runniing full boost" or "I was only running 12psi" etc.

:werd: That, and its fun to flick the switch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...