Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys'n'Gals (not sure if this is the right forum, moderators please move if not)

I am in the process of putting an RB20 DET into an my S13 and, as I also have an R32 GTR which is currently being dry sumped by Dazmo, one of the true genltemen in our sport, I thought I would install two factory standard rb26 turbos onto the RB20 rather than going to a high mount. I am getting steamer pipe manifolds made as two of the head/manifold studs didn't line up with the RB26 manifold. Would have used the RB26 plenum as well and triple throttle bodies but the intake venturies on the RB20 are tapered and would not allow any flow increase from having extra throttle bodies so went with an aftermarket plenum and 85mm throttle body. Also went with MAP sensing rather than AFMs.

The car will have two tunes in its Microtec LT12, one for me to do circuit work with a rear wheel drive car and one for my son to learn drifting. I am aiming for about 300rwhp and will eventually swap the Garret 2860-7 turrbos from my GTR with -5s and put the -7s into the S13. I am not sure how laggy the S13 will be for circuit work, should be fine for driftin. Have considered using an exhaust cam off a non turbo RB20 which has a slightly higher lift or going to an after market cam with a few degree longer opening (if that is the correct terminoligy) to increase the exhaust gasses to the turbos.

I would really appreciate any constructive Tips or Traps to look out for with this build from anyone who has done this type of conversion before.

Thanks

Pete

PS. Lookout for my R32 once Dazmo has finished with it. Can't say I will be able to to get to 'Holy Grail' status at Willowbank but I bet Darren will.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/308012-rb20-dett-s13-conversion/
Share on other sites

someone here did GTR turbo's onto a 20 a while ago... there was nothing below 4500-5000rpm from memory, it'll be a very peaky setup.

More than it should be anyway... then you've added a larger plenum and TB so it could be a little bit nastier again inbetween gear changes.

Someone here will remember who did it... was a thread about it actually.

someone here did GTR turbo's onto a 20 a while ago... there was nothing below 4500-5000rpm from memory, it'll be a very peaky setup.

More than it should be anyway... then you've added a larger plenum and TB so it could be a little bit nastier again inbetween gear changes.

Someone here will remember who did it... was a thread about it actually.

theres never anything below 4g on an rb20 anyway unless it has stock turbo. 

You dont need different tunes, its a common misconception even more relevant with a microtech as it has the most basic calculations to determine mapping, the way an engine pulls through the mapping will be no different between drifting or circuit. One tune will do. Having done a few rb conversions (our current one attached (430rwkw)) i must admit they are a dog to circuit, they require allot of work just to get back to where you were with the SR20. Im a big fan of RB20's but in a s13 they offer to much weight over the front axle centerline and have poor low end performance a good SR20 will always be a better proposition. We run a RB26 in our current car and the work to get it to handle like it did with a 300rwkw SR20 was quite astounding and even then it is still compromise. Those who say a RB powered S13 handle well unfortunately must have never experienced "decent" handling :nyaanyaa:

The twin setup would be ultra laggy and pretty bad for drifting especially a beginner (a beginner needs power on demand to make up for small mistakes) i reckon a realistic boost peak at around 5000-5300rpm and you would need to up the limiter to about 8500 and up just to keep a decent power band that is useable.

If your dead set on the rb20 then look at a TD06SL2-20g (i can now source them internally gated) it is probably the best all round turbo kit we have seen or used on the rb20 (with minor mods) again see attached

post-34927-1265979208_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1265979244_thumb.jpg

Oh ye i appreciate no turbo is "responsive" on the ole RB20

What i mean is the GTR twins, plus larger plenum, plus single TB and so on... it's going to be REALLY bad for the power that it will make.

I would be surprised if there is anything below 5000rpm. A 2530 would do a better job and give you at least 500rpm extra, and a nicer throttle response in between gears and so on.

5000rpm before anything starts for a peak of 240rwkw (GTR turbos) is not really at all productive. You'd be lucky to be making 200rwkw @ 6000rpm

When the RB26 cops a 2.8L crank then the lil twin turbo will love the 2.6L crank :nyaanyaa: I know i sometimes think about going -7s on an RB24...but manifolding, cost of two turbos and complexity/packaging means i like singles. But done properly it cant be any worse then running a big single. Can it? :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...