Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought the car was already tuned?

the r33 that got tuned last week with .5 front .82 rear 3582 chra, didnt make peak power until somewhere around 185-193kmph mark

this one with .7 front .82 rear makes its power 55kmph sooner? be good to see a few other dyno sheets with rpm boost afr

I have built 2x GT3582 spec sleeve bearing turbos. One was sent to you in your KKR housing and .70 comp. The other one was built in .82 turbine with .50 comp.

With the 2nd turbo I virtually gave it away for free just to get a experience after receiving a complaint from you with the lag issue. It was not as bad as what you've experienced with the KKR housing.

That R33 had stock cams, internal gate and turbo didn't have any run in time. Straight on and dyno tune. So the polymolicue libricator that we used to stablise the shaft would have some affects on the response.

I'm going to get both cars to do another run in few weeks time so we can compare results, and see the differences that external gate and cams have made.

Nick believe KM/H is more accountable. I had a look through the dynosheet section and it seems KMH/RPM scale varies from dyno to dyno.

I'm taking a average sacle of:

1KM = 39RPM. So you can work it out:

65 : 2535

85 : 3315

105 : 4095

125 : 4875

145 : 5655

165 : 6435

175 : 6825

His dyno's analyzer is broken. it can only show Power , speed and torque at this stage. Probably can get the car to run on another dyno once its tuned.

kwickr33: Let me know when you want to run on more boost. I can cover your dyno time thats not a problem.

How is Km/h more accountable when your claiming spool speed in rpm. Wheel spin will root up Km/h.RPM/KMH ramp rate can change speed of spool slightly but engine rpm is directly proportional to engine/spool speed Unless your trying to dodge the printouts and running in 3rd. Rpm would be best to back up claims

Edited by RB26 cefiro

The tuner believed in such, all tunes he've done for me and my customers cars are in KMH. I did question about scales in RPMS which that was his answer.

Also this is a roller dyno, if it does not read the RPMS directly of the engine but accumulates it from KMH then his explanation do make sense

The tuner believed in such, all tunes he've done for me and my customers cars are in KMH. I did question about scales in RPMS which that was his answer.

Also this is a roller dyno, if it does not read the RPMS directly of the engine but accumulates it from KMH then his explanation do make sense

If it is a hub dyno like a dynapac then it would be a accurate account as long as you enter the correct diff and gear ratio figures. But the tuner is using a chassis Roller dyno which introduces many other factors the main being wheel spin, inertia and size of tyre/rim etc. Your tuner is using a mainline so there is no reason not to be able to show rpm as it can be picked up from either coil or injector unless he is either too lazy to hook up or there is a bit of smoke and mirror action going on. A log of also the boost/rpm would also show response

What ramp rate was it run up on??

Edited by RB26 cefiro
I thought the car was already tuned?

the r33 that got tuned last week with .5 front .82 rear 3582 chra, didnt make peak power until somewhere around 185-193kmph mark

this one with .7 front .82 rear makes its power 55kmph sooner? be good to see a few other dyno sheets with rpm boost afr

That would be because he rang the ting up in third gear instead of forth. Dont belive me 4th gear is 1.00:1 ratio 3rd is 1.302:1

So multipy his claimed 140km/h x 1.302 = 183kph which is close enough to call BS

You are telling me he's driven 175KM/H on 3rd gear.

This was done on 4th gear. I was present duing the tune. Go to the dynosheet section and check every one elses reading that is on the 4th gear and see what's the average KMH they’ve run.

never mind. I will take a video for you on the next tune up.

You are telling me he's driven 175KM/H on 3rd gear.

This was done on 4th gear. I was present duing the tune. Go to the dynosheet section and check every one elses reading that is on the 4th gear and see what's the average KMH they've run.

never mind. I will take a video for you on the next tune up.

Power figure is very strange after 140km/h dead flat at 300kw for 35Km/h the power to 175. The power actual peaks above the 140kmh at 154 and 164. If it was at a fast enough ramp rate you could easily over speed car on limiter till then which can give that effect of dead flat power

Well I'm not a dyno expert. I guess I need to ask Nick on Monday.

It was definitely run on 4th gear, I was watching him doing that. If rev limiter goes on and off I don't believe you will get a constraint power curve or have any incensement in speed.

Other thing is note where the peak is, The car had few slight miss up the top. which you can see from the inconsistence after 150kmh. Not sure if that could cause that.

Look. This car's coming back for further tuning in few weeks time. I will shoot some video footages so we are all clear.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...