Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Just wondering if anyone would have any idea as to what power my car is putting out.

Its a R34 Gt-t

It has the following Modifications.

- 3" turbo back exhaust with high flow cat

- Trust pod filter

- E-boost set at around .7 to .8 bar

- Front mount intercooler.

Also,

Im considering putting in a Microtech LTX-12.

What could I then expect with this properly tuned and running at around 1 bar boost?

Is 250rwkw realisticly achievable?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30912-power-figures-what-am-i-making/
Share on other sites

I'd say with your current mods you are on around 170rwkw in shootout mode.

You won't get more than 200rwkw out of the standard turbo and thats with having all the other small bits n pieces done.

I'm running 400bhp (266kw) at the flywheel on my GTT and the 1st thing I had to change was the Turbo as it can't make high bhp/kw figures.

My Car is similar to Franks and has the following done

Trust TD05-18G Turbo

FMIC

Blitz SBC-iD @ 1.2bar (17.5psi)

Bigger injectors/pump

head gasket

PowerFC

GTR clutch and brakes

Oil Cooler

There's a lot of other bits but thats the main power increase stuff.

250rwkw is about the maximum a standard RB25DET block could take and you should really think about a bottom end rebuild.

It should be a fantastic car when it's done!

The RB25DET can take alot more than that, i've seen over 270rwkw with everything standard.  

Franks only has the standard turbo too.

I agree, the standard GTT block can take alot more than 250rwkw :wassup:

I reckon more in the vicinity of 300rwkw would be borderline? :headspin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...