Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I'd love to get into some small time photography and start up a small blog of random HQ photos etc.

Now I don't really have the first clue about photography or what camera would be good to start with.

Basically I would be looking for something between $400-$800. A digital camera that would have adjustable shutter speeds, focal lengths etc etc. A camera that can take still shots at a very high resolution.

If anyone has any ideas or experience or can offer me any advice, it would be greatly appreciated!

Cheers,

Jace.

Edited by syfon
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309384-what-camera-to-buy/
Share on other sites

Even if you're not going to get a D-SLR camera, then the tutorials at Canon's website can be very helpful in teaching you about what all the photographic terms are, and how they relate to each other.

http://www1.canon.com.au/worldOfEos/learn/home/default.aspx

And if you've got any experience with Photoshop (or Photoshop Elements), then a camera that takes shots in RAW format is awesome!

DSLR is the way to go, as someone else said if you can get your hands on a Canon 350D or even a 450D, you can expand your setup overtime with new lenses and swap out the body when you have more $$$

As a reference, a Canon 500D is about $1200-$1400 with the twin IS kit form memory (which is the newer version than that 450D)

trust me, the best option would be to increase your price range :P

the reason i say that is when photography first interested me i bought a Olympus sp570UZ camera for 600bucks, and got addicted to taking photos like most ppl do lol and immediately wanted bigger and better things

my advice would to be to skip the "practice" camera and go for an entry level dslr

ive got a canon 450d dslr with basic 18-55mm lens (900bucks)

and an additional 50mm 1.8lens (130bucks)

with two more lenses on the way

a 70-300mm landscape lens and a 100mm macro l lens..$$$$ tho

in conclusion, put aside some extra money for a camera that u wont upgrade in a years time. get a dslr.the lens range and aperture/shutter/iso combinations = an excellent learning curve and excellent photos.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...