Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HKS 350Z GT SUPERCHARGER FULL KIT INSTALL

post-24739-1268030538_thumb.jpg

THE 350Z HAS HAD AN INTAKE AND EXHAUST AND A BASIC ECU UPGRADE ALREADY, IT MADE ON OUR DYNAPACK DYNO 240 hp @ 6800rpm AND 290 nm @ 4200pm

post-24739-1268030547_thumb.jpg

ON THE DYNO FOR BASE LINE POWER

post-24739-1268030561_thumb.jpg

HERE IS THE HKS GT SUPERCHARGER GTS7040 RATED TO 400HP, TO GIVE U AN IDEA OF SIZE COMPARED TO AN iPHONE

post-24739-1268030570_thumb.jpg

THIS IS AN INTERNAL PICTURE OF THE HKS GT SUPERCHARGER IT IS A TORQUE REACTION DRIVE TYPE CENTRIFUGAL SUPERCHARGER, THIS DESIGN REDUCES NOISE AND RETAINS GOOD FUEL CONSUMPTION FOR AN ECONOMICAL FORCED INDUCTION SYSTEM

post-24739-1268030675_thumb.jpg

DISASSEMBLING OF INLET MANIFOLD TO FIT EXTRA INJECTORS

post-24739-1268030630_thumb.jpg

EXTRA INJECTORS CONTROLLED BY THE F-CON ECU

post-24739-1268030708_thumb.jpg

SUPERCHARGER BRACKET IN PLACE

post-24739-1268030716_thumb.jpg

INTERCOOLER, SUPERCHARGER OIL RESERVOIR AND OIL COOLER MOUNTED

post-24739-1268030724_thumb.jpg

SUPERCHARGER IN ITS MOUNTING BRACKET

post-24739-1268030752_thumb.jpg

INTERCOOLER AND PIPING

post-24739-1268030794_thumb.jpg

SUPERCHARGER OIL RESERVOIR PLUMBED IN

post-24739-1268030803_thumb.jpg

POLISHED INLET PIPE IN POSITION

post-24739-1268030810_thumb.jpg

THE FINISHED INSTALL

post-24739-1268030852_thumb.jpg

SUPERCHARGER INSTALLED READY FOR WORK

post-24739-1268030861_thumb.jpg

UPGRADED CLUTCH AND SINGLE MASS FLYWHEEL TO HANDLE THE EXTRA POWER

post-24739-1268030869_thumb.jpg

AND THE COMPLETED JOB IT MADE 315HP @ 6200RPM AND 398NM @ 4500RPM A GREAT INCREASE OF 77HP AND 109NM

post-24739-1268030911_thumb.jpg

post-24739-1268030919_thumb.jpg

post-24739-1268030927_thumb.jpg

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US ON (07) 3356 9401 OR SEND AN EMAIL TO [email protected].

PLEASE VISIT OUR BLOG http://gtmotorgroup.blogspot.com

Very neat and tidy.

Wonder what the cost of that setup is in relation to the amount of increased power it provides? The increase of 77hp & 109nm doesnt appear to be a great deal for what I would imagine looks like a very exxy kit.

Pretty sure HKS charge like a wounded bull for just about everything they make. Unless it can be geared up and make more power, but kept low because of standard motor?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...