Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its more than he was willing to do, fair enough. If it were me...

He just needs another pair of hub dynos, or some rollers bolted to the ground under the front wheels would do the job.

Just got back from RE, Cihan managed to wring 211awkw out of it on 98, mods since last week's 195 tune were the plenum spacer, thanks Cam, and the 610cc injectors.

Then I dumped 60L of E85 in the tank, add 20% fuel to the map and instantly power shot up, we only advanced the timing 1 degree, boost 1 psi and as you can see, it made heaps more power right through, nearly 40awkw in the midrange. Needless to say I am very happy with the result.

Next will be the ecu reflash to rid it of the throttle lag, then if that doesnt work, the cable throttle will go on.

post-63525-1268632693_thumb.jpg

Nice work Scottie....but you have to stop soon as you are just tempting me to spend more money on my car....LOL

Just got back from RE, Cihan managed to wring 211awkw out of it on 98, mods since last week's 195 tune were the plenum spacer, thanks Cam, and the 610cc injectors.

Then I dumped 60L of E85 in the tank, add 20% fuel to the map and instantly power shot up, we only advanced the timing 1 degree, boost 1 psi and as you can see, it made heaps more power right through, nearly 40awkw in the midrange. Needless to say I am very happy with the result.

Next will be the ecu reflash to rid it of the throttle lag, then if that doesnt work, the cable throttle will go on.

Very nice Sir... very nice indeed. :)

So if we went on the previous calibration of the RE dyno it would be around the 250 mark, as predicted, yes?

Is there any reason in particular that Cihan decided to stop at 1 degree advancement though?

hmm... 630nm does sound lovely... so what are the rules governing piggyback ECU's for E85???

Edited by iamhe77

More timing would just wear the piston skirts and I dont need the extra powah, or do I? Maybe next tune I will bump it up a bit just to see. As far as legality, I think you know the answer Cam.

You're right Andy, I have to stop sometime, but not yet. :)

More timing would just wear the piston skirts and I dont need the extra powah, or do I? Maybe next tune I will bump it up a bit just to see. As far as legality, I think you know the answer Cam.

lol...

I think you will be happy with that power figure for about 2 months (max).

I thought as much regarding the ECU, but I hadn't heard anything and I thought that maybe you had... oh well :)

hmmmm......guess that puts VIC infront in the KW's for the NM35.

So what am I chasing 211AWKW's on 98?.....only 9AWKW's to go! Might have to do something about that! :O

We should set up a Dyno shootout between the 2 states.....in Albury or Wodonga?

Wonder what mine will do on a dyno with some Sunoco.....think we might have some laying around somewhere. :O

In all seriousness.....well done Scott......we just need to get SAS into gear now aye! :(....starting to catch the tractor motors now aye!!! :O

Edited by Jetwreck

lol.... 211.... sorta.

Remember when he dyno'd after installing the intake pipe? That same dyno read 221awkw.

Then at the dyno shoot out it read ~20awkw lower for some reason.

Would need to see it on a different dyno methinks, but I can tell you one thing... that damn thing f**king MOVES now.

Considerably faster than before (it actually pushed me well back in my seat last night - hadn't done that before @ "221awkw").

The dyno has to be reading low as Scotty's M35 is, from my experience, easily quicker than a 2009 Audi S5 Coupe

Yep, would be pretty happy with that :(

Edited by iamhe77

Theres definitely alot more room in the e85 tuning, my series one 260RS has had major power gains since tuning on e85, the extra octane allows for alot more timing without pinging. On 98 pump fuel i was making 313rwkw on 19psi, and at that stage it started to pick up a bit of pinging, so we decided to retune on e85 to see the difference. After a retune and seeing the power potential, extra timing and extra boost saw the power leap to 370rwkw on 25psi. We have since done a safe tune on 22psi making 350rwkw. I do have a full forged build though! :cool:

Edited by GRIM_R32

Trying for a bite mate? :P

I think you had better sort out your ecu issues first, wouldnt want the black barge self destructing on the rollers. ;)

hmmmm......guess that puts VIC infront in the KW's for the NM35.

So what am I chasing 211AWKW's on 98?.....only 9AWKW's to go! Might have to do something about that! :)

We should set up a Dyno shootout between the 2 states.....in Albury or Wodonga?

Wonder what mine will do on a dyno with some Sunoco.....think we might have some laying around somewhere. :)

In all seriousness.....well done Scott......we just need to get SAS into gear now aye! :cool: ....starting to catch the tractor motors now aye!!! :)

Im guessing ive hit my goal of 250, I just havent seen the proof yet. Cihan thinks 260 is attainable on this dyno still but I need this a reliable daily.

Im really thinking of going with his suggestion of Cable throttle, even though I know it will be a can of worms. The throttle lag is very noticeable now. PITA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
    • Which solenoid? Why was it changed? Again, why was this done? ...well, these wear..but ultimately, why was it changed? Did you reset the idle voltage level after fitment? I'm just a tad confused ~ the flash code doesn't allude to these items being faulty, so in my mind the only reason to change these things, would be some drive-ability issue....and if that's the case, what was the problem? Those questions aside, check if the dropping resistor is OK ...should be 11~14 ohms (TCU doesn't throw a flash code for this) ~ also, these TCU designs have full time power (to keep fault code RAM alive), and I think that'll throw a logic code (as opposed to the 10 hardware codes), if that power is missing (or the ram has gone bad in the TCU, which you can check..but that's another story here perhaps).
    • Question for people who "know stuff" I am looking at doing the new intake like the one in the picture (the pictured is designed for the OEM TB and intake plenum), this design has the filter behind the front bar, but, the filter sits where the OEM duct heads into the front bar, and the standard aperture when the OEM ducting is removed allows the filter to pulled back out of the front bar into the engine bay for servicing, a simple blanking plate is used to seal the aperture behind the filter This will require a 45° silicone hose from the TB, like the alloy pipe that is currently there, to another 45° silicone hose to get a straight run to the aperture in the front bar Question: how will it effect the tune if I move the MAF about 100-150mm forward, the red is around where my MAF is currently, and the green would be where it would end up Like this This is the hole the filter goes through  Ends up like this LOL..Cheers    
    • Despite the level up question, actually I do know what that is....it is a pressure sender wire.  So check out around the oil filter for an oil pressure sender, or maybe fuel pressure near the filter or on the engine. Possibly but less likely coolant pressure sensor because they tend to be combined temp/pressure senders if you have one. Could also be brake pressure (in a brake line somewhere pre ABS) but maybe I'm the only one that has that on a skyline.
    • Pull codes via the self-diagnosis procedure. As far as I can tell this is just a sign of transmission issues but not a code unto itself.
×
×
  • Create New...