Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Almost. The standard gauge is mmhg or millimetres of mercury. 7 on the gauge (which is 700) equals 13.5 psi

ok well explain why on my old gauge all it had was -1, 0 , and +1 and in the middle of the gauge it says X100KPA

have a look for your self .

post-70954-1268781340_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

that guage doesnt look stock / OEM

it loooks like a cheap knock off

ive never seen a guage show +1 to -1 KPA like that

are you sure its stock ?

yes its stock

my mate has an r34 and guess what its the same !!!!

maybe there different in the r33 (whitch you own NOT AN R34)

go onto ebay and type in r34 stock gauges and see what they are or better yet ask someone else on here who actualy has an r34 and see what they say !!!!.

mine has -1 to 1 in kg/square cm, which is pretty close to one atmosphere, which is 14.7psi. So when mine shows about 0.8 max boost, thats something like 12psi. Assuming its accurate.

Mine are pretty much the same as the pic above. They have a dark background tho, but maybe thats just the flash. It looks pretty similar in symbols etc to the dash

mine has -1 to 1 in kg/square cm, which is pretty close to one atmosphere, which is 14.7psi. So when mine shows about 0.8 max boost, thats something like 12psi. Assuming its accurate.

Mine are pretty much the same as the pic above. They have a dark background tho, but maybe thats just the flash. It looks pretty similar in symbols etc to the dash

My R34 boost gauge is just like that, not like the one in the picture. Contrary to popular opinion, my one is also very accurate.

I have tested it against my PFC boost controller output on the hand controller, and on another mechanical gauge and they all read the same.

It is however very unreliable! It only works about 10% of the time!

mine has -1 to 1 in kg/square cm, which is pretty close to one atmosphere, which is 14.7psi. So when mine shows about 0.8 max boost, thats something like 12psi. Assuming its accurate.

Mine are pretty much the same as the pic above. They have a dark background tho, but maybe thats just the flash. It looks pretty similar in symbols etc to the dash

yeah i thing the whit backgroung is because its a series 2 my mates is a darker background as well , but i was trying to point out to the know all its not a cheap ripoff its just that its in kpa not mmhg.

there must have been a change between the r33 and r34

yeah i was told its more acurate to put in psi because its easyer to get a psi reading instead of the conversions and guess work (as in if its .7 .8 or .9 kpa)

?!

My R34 boost gauge is just like that, not like the one in the picture. Contrary to popular opinion, my one is also very accurate.

I have tested it against my PFC boost controller output on the hand controller, and on another mechanical gauge and they all read the same.

It is however very unreliable! It only works about 10% of the time!

Mines the same also, dark face, -1 to +1 and i have an 02 model. And it's accurate. Although it's been replaced by the nismo triple gauge cluster now, as it didn't read high enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lamb roast on Saturday will be different 🥲
    • They are under bucket shims. Tomei provides a test shim kit and then any measurement of shim required. 
    • I always wondered how you were supposed to buy a set of 24 buckets and somehow magically have every single one of them yield exactly the desired clearance. I would have thought you'd need to assemble a cam with either 12 "sample" or "example" buckets of known top thickness (or a single such sample/example 12 times over!!) measure clearances at every valve, and then do the usual math to work out what the actual "shimness" of each bucket needed to be, before buying the required buckets to make up he thicknesses that you didn't have on hand.
    • I now seem to be limited in power due to my rev limit/hydraulic lifters in my built RB25. I'm looking into converting over to Tomei solid lifters. Question for anyone that has done the conversion. I was always under the impression that when using the Tomei solid lifter conversion, you would also require new valves (Longer or shorter stems, I can't remember which).  I don't know where I got this idea, as so far I see no mention of this in any of the Tomei documentation. It just states I need the Tomei solid buckets, solid lifter cams and upgraded springs. As my head is already built, all I would need is another set of 1000$ Kelford cams, 500$ buckets and about 4H hours of my time installing and I'm off to the races!?!? There's no way it's that simple, I must be missing something? 
    • I couldn't agree more. I should have started from the get-go with a NEO or solid bucket conversion. I started looking into converting over to solid lifters yesterday. Now for some reason I was always under the impression that when using the Tomei solid lifter conversion, you would also require new valves (Longer or shorter stems, I can't remember which).  But I see no mention of this on any of the Tomei documentation. It just states that I need the Tomei solid buckets, solid lifter cams and upgraded springs. As my head is already built, all I would need is another set of 1000$ Kelford cams, 500$ buckets and about 4H hours of my time installing and I'm off to the races!?!? There's no way it's that simple, I must be missing something? 
×
×
  • Create New...