Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As part of the Sydney Aviation Model Show this year in May we are looking for Nissan skyline GTR's to be displayed at the show over the weekend.

We are looking for the following;

8 x R32 GTR

8 x R33 GTR

8 x R34 GTR

4 x R35 GTR

Cost is $30.00 per car

Cars will be judged by show attendees as "GTR Crowd Favourite"

Attendees will be provided 2 votes and votes must be for 2 different variants. (Eg: R33 and R34)

1st Prize $400.00 Cash and Helicopter Flight

2nd Prize Helicopter Flight

3rd Prize Helicopter Flight

All participants recieve a certificate and a $10 hot food voucher for both days.

To enter please email;

GTR Variant

Year of Manufacture

And a picture of your car.

[email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/312125-gtrs-for-display-at-show/
Share on other sites

Just to make sure, this is a static display?

Seeing as it's an aircraft show and there's probably an airstrip involved.............?!

Sounds great either way, I'm a plane fan :)

what happens overnight, are the cars locked up, taken home, onsite security, locked in a hangar between planes etc?

$30 is for both days?

Planes plus performance cars is an awesome combo

Sounds really good!

Just to make sure, this is a static display?

Seeing as it's an aircraft show and there's probably an airstrip involved.............?!

Sounds great either way, I'm a plane fan :D

what happens overnight, are the cars locked up, taken home, onsite security, locked in a hangar between planes etc?

$30 is for both days?

Planes plus performance cars is an awesome combo

Sounds really good!

Yeah its a static display. :)

Overnight you will have the option of leaving your cars at the airport, we have a dedicated security patrol for the show (24 hours) but you can also just take your cars home and come back the next day.

$30 is for both days!

Get in touch and book your spot! :(

Edited by DANSR33

***Guys this competition has been cancelled.***

****************************************

****************************************

________________________________________________________________________________

_____________

HOWEVER

There is still a car display at the show but it will be a variety of cars rather than just GTR's, entry for this is free.

All participants will get a free lunch both days and go in to the draw to win a helicopter joy flight for 3 people just by having your car on show!

Get in touch soon as space is very limited...

________________________________________________________________________________

_____________

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...