Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I think my 32 seems to have a possible air leak somewhere which is making my torque drop just after my turbo fully spools.

Heres some info of what we've done so far:

(RB25 engine) Forward facing plenum has been machined and so has the manifold

Gaskets replaced

Turbo is a GCG Hi Flowed R33 turbo

Greddy cooler has been tested for leaks

Piping has been flared and silicon hoses have been secured and some replaced

Car was also dyno'd with the exhaust taken off from the dump but results didn't change

Here's the dyno graph, sorry its a bit blurry, was in a rush.dynoz.jpg

Mine is the green one.

If you guys have any ideas or need some more information, please shout out :P

Cheers.

Edited by tkdbboy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/312388-boost-leak-torque-drop-problem/
Share on other sites

AFRs were on a stable 12. The other graph plotted is of another rb25 r32 with an almost identical setup, main difference is that has a gcg r34 neo turbo high flowed and stock plenum setup (im running a greddy forward facing). So its very unlikely its a tuning problem

I really dont understand why you think it is a boost leak??

The boost pressure looks excellent, very constant.

I would class it as a lack of power and appears to be some sort of restriction.

My initial thoughts are blocked exhaust, maybe a blocked cat or something. Have you tried dropping the cat and doing a dyno run?

Harey, read the first post again. Exhaust was dropped at dump already with no change...

Have to agree with most that its not a boost leak. Strong, steady boost plot!

Out of interest exactly what mods do you have? Have a very similar setup so would just like to know but may also help with diagnosis...

Edited by wlspn

Thanks for the replies guys!

Mods are as follows:

gcg hi flow r33 turbo

3 inch exhaust all the way through

splitfire coilpacks

manual mechanical boost controller

forward facing plenum with 100mm throttle body

greddy FMIC

Power FC

Adjustable cam gear set to stock timing

Bosch 040 fuel pump

Although I am running a stock 33 airbox with a Greddy filter but also with stock piping running to the turbo and also no BOV. So Stao could be onto something :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...