Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yay finerly got rid of my camry and got my self a 1989 R32 GTST 4 door.

IT's in good nic with a kakamoto exhasut and unkown brand pod filter and lowered. (front lookes farked as it sit way low to the rear).

Time for me to hit hidden vally and start drifitng.

post-32868-1271068664_thumb.jpg

post-32868-1271068789_thumb.jpg

post-32868-1271068838_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316426-got-my-new-car/
Share on other sites

That looks ace mate.

How do you rate the performance.

Im guessing its way better than ya 31 even though that went well.

Cheers Wayne.

Oh yeah.. Welcome to the(import) 4 door club

Hi agan wayne being a while.

performance is good, I would say handling wise the chassie is stiffer then the 31 and it brakes better then the 31 (even with r33 gtst brake up grade from al)

has a bit more power to. altho im starting to hate the lag from 0 to 3k when i put the foot down.

the 31 was a good car to learn in and with some time i could have made it nice but keep getting done by the cops and it keep brakeing.

gona take it to the drags this friday and maybe drift it to.

brentt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316426-got-my-new-car/#findComment-5180715
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Nice car did you get this off Damien??

Yea i think that was him porn*injapan on boost yea

got it dynoed the other day at 138RWKW at 14psi

and 15.3 @ 90mph before winding up the boost.

looking at a r33 turbo and r34 smic atm

Edited by redliningr31 skyline
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316426-got-my-new-car/#findComment-5265463
Share on other sites

Yea he's a good mate of mine. Very clean car when I saw it.

Ah go manual

Also look at the VG30 turbo it has steel wheels I got 204RWKW on 16psi with AVC-R and there pretty cheap and pretty much direct replacement. Some model RB20 have a different banjo bolt but thats easy fixed some time they can sut bolt on.

I have a few supporting mods to get that figure Nistune computer,040 fuel pump, FMIC, 550cc injectors, VG30 tubo, JJR coil packs All the Dyno work was done my Keelan at Peckys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316426-got-my-new-car/#findComment-5269280
Share on other sites

Yea have being happy with it when i brought it and yes it is clean.

thanks for the advice on mods. ive got a 34 smic on the way and a r33turbo. will look at the vg30 later on. def will be getting a nistune and bosh 040.

at the moment im gona concentrate on suspention as she understeers alot (found out on last drift practice and motakana).

and manual will be when i can find the cash.

Edited by redliningr31 skyline
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/316426-got-my-new-car/#findComment-5277352
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...