Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got me the last one available till next shipment arrives hehe

west shocks had 6 in stock 5 were already spoken for.

right to how easy is it to install? considering i don't know what the rear sub frame looks like but think i found the rear of it but can't tell where the front is.

or should i just get the guys servicing it to put it on Monday?

ps: and what NVH? it says kit will increase NVH as well as not being suitable for road use.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3174-kca349-diff-lock-kit/
Share on other sites

Its relatively easy to install. Just make sure to have (or borrow) a torque wrench, crow bar and an extra pair of hands.

The front mount for the diff cradle is just infront of the rear wheel and is closer to the outside of car than the rear mount is.

NVH is not too bad after install. I didn't notice any increase in noise, although thats probably cause the noise from my rear wheel bearing is drowning it out :D It lets a little bit more vibration into the cabin when you put the power down, but it just adds to the go-fast rush. The biggest positive for me (on stock suspension), is that it got rid the crab walk the rear end does when you go over certain bumps.

Heres instructions that someone posted on the whiteline yahoo group:

          First thing I did was dive under the car to find where they go. Then I decided to drive my car up some ramps. (The exhaust slightly scrapes the ramps.) The ring locations are roughly: Front- just in front of the rear wheel partially covered by a metal plate. Rear- just in front of the fuel tank located a little further towards the middle than the fronts. A rear control sits almost underneath the rear location.

There are 2 nuts and 1 bolt on each side at the front to undo. The bolt and one nut are 13mm??? and the main nut is 17mm. I decided that I should work on only on bush at a time. (Prolly not good to have your subframe all undone :) I managed to get the nuts undone with rachet/sockets I used a short extension on the bolt (closest to center of car). This gives clearance and ease of turning where the exhaust gets in the way. Once the three nut/bolts are undone the metal plate comes off (prolly falls off)

Simply put the bush on the metal plate and stick it back up where it came from. The rubber bushing already in place does not need removing (I did try but had no chance :) plus you want that there if you wish to return to nromal. -why you would I don't know I have little or no increase in NVH)

You can use the outermost nut to hold the plate in place. Once this is so, use a Jack to push the plate/ring up so you can get the 17mm nut back on. Before tightening this up up all the way drop the JAck, but make sure the nut isn't going to fly off. Tighten this up (there is a torque setting somewhere if you have a torque wrench otherwise just get it damn tight) and hopefully the remaining bolt will go in fairly easily (i.e. hole lined up with bolt-worked for me every time). Repeat for the other side. Easy :) (well it should have been)                                                                                                                        Now for the rears. I used the smaller rings (i.e large at front, small at rear for best overall) These in theory are even easier. Unfortunately I discovered that it is quite hard to get the nuts on/off. This was much simplified by using a long extension shaft on the socket. I also used a pipe to extend the rachet handle (also for the front). Once I did this is was a piece of cake (other than breaking the extension shaft on the last nut). Once again place the ring on the metal cup and push it up so you can get the nut on. (I didn't need to use the jack-in fact there is little room to get a jack on and tighten the nut-possible but not really practical)

Drive your car down the ramp and off you go.

That was done on a 300zx, so a few things are differnt for us, like no need for a socket extension because the rear control arm isn't in the way. The exhaust may be in the way though.

Are these those yellow donut things that get rid of axle tramp???

Or is it an actuall mechanical diff locker?

If it's the donut thingies that you put in your sub frame I'd be keen to know how you go with them. See how much more traction you get off the line...

I've already got a locker diff :D :D

Sweet.

Yeah I've heard that they twist (or something) to give you more traction. Something like - under power they will twist the diff down a little to give better traction????? Aparently you can set them up for drift too :D

Skyzerr33 - Let us know how it goes.

Thanks

J

Heres a web site showing an install of similar bushes on another Z (only in red instead of yellow). Those guys have to use a jack and jack stands just to get under the car, but its easy enuf to do on a 'line without jacking up :D

http://www.z32.org/html/subframespacers.shtml

There's no placebo effect here! You can feel it putting down power in 1st gear, when in the past it would happily wheel spin.

The most important thing it does is get rid of 1 inches of slack the rubber bushings give the sub-frame. After that, you can set it up for drift or traction by changing geometry of the diff in relation to the wheel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...