Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To all this is the official list of all intersections that are equiped with FULL TIME red light and speed cameras....even if you dont go through the red you will still get pinged for speeding.....

*Nth Tce and K/william rd

*Goodwood rd and Cross rd

*Sturt rd and Marion rd

*Wheatsheaf rd and South road

*Glynburn rd and Montecute rd

*south rd and Torrens rd

*North tce and Frome rd

*Regency rd and Main Nth rd

*South rd and Manton rd

*Daws rd amd South rd

*The Golden way and The Grove way

*George rd and Lower Nth east rd

*Salisbury Hwy and Kings rd

*Prospect rd and Fitzroy Tce

*The Parade and Glynburn rd

*Marion rd and Cross rd

*Beach rd and Dyson rd

*Portrush rd and Magill rd

*Golden Grv rd and Milne rd

*Goodwood rd and West tce

*Sturt rd and Brighton rd

*Crittenden rd and Findon rd

*St Bernards rd and Montecute rd

*Pulteney st and Wakefield St

*West tce and Anzac Hwy

I hope this may benefit all to save a few dollars!!!

Regards,

SKYLINE...... :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31812-beware/
Share on other sites

Yes, I love how the road toll has come right down now they have so many speed cameras/defect stations/double demerit points/defect blitz on imports. The government is doing a fantastic job with the whole situation - introduce more speed cameras - that will fix the problem. /sarcasm

How about they instigate a proper road safety campaign where they force every single driver to do a defensive driving course so they actually learn to drive. I spend all day on the road, and by far the biggest offenders of pulling out in front of people/following too closely/not indicating/not giving way or stopping at signs, is older people - suprisingly not 'young hoons in their import/high performance cars'.

Yes speed can be a factor, but the root of the problem is way deeper than introducing more cameras IMHO. Of course the government already knows this - they just want more revenue. Instead of 'speed cameras save lives' signs after cameras, they need to put 'speed cameras raise government revenue' lol. And fyi I haven't been done for speeding since I have owned my 200SX, in fact my last fine was in Darwin nearly 4 years ago. :(

/end rant

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31812-beware/#findComment-640457
Share on other sites

hey dean .. why dont' u go test it for all of us :) .. if it sets off at 75 ... then ... bad luck to the guy getting caught ... thats 25% over ... its not as bad as i thought ... also .. i was wondering ... cause i been watchin tv and seen them cop commercials of the camera detecting you speeding from in front and then u see it makin funny noises like in star wars and it instantly zooming into your number plate ... which is bollocks imho ... sif they can do that ... anyways they can't flash u from in front can they?? what if you're doing 80?? the cop can't do anything unless the roads are pretty empty and he can chuck a U turn?? am i right?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31812-beware/#findComment-642001
Share on other sites

Well this must mean the govt is running out of money. Whenever the budget looks a bit worse than usual, fines go up or more speed cameras go on the road - which wouldnt be tooo bad if only 1 cent in ever $10 went into building decent roads

Thanks for the warning about the speed cameras.

The redlight cameras dont stop people running red lights, but I am sure these ones will work really well, and we will have no more people killed on the roads cos now everyone will drive better:p

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31812-beware/#findComment-642406
Share on other sites

TIMMMAYYY, from the vic forums

Yes the excess speed ranges have changed - thought you all would've known this.

Old:

1pt 3-15km $110 or so

3pt 16-30km $160 or so

6pt 31-45km $240 or so + suspension for 3 months

6pt 46-60km $360 or so + suspension for 6 months

etc

New

Speed Less than 10 KM/H $125.00 1 Demerit Point  

*** Note LESS THAN 10KM that means 1KM/H!!!!***

Speed by 10 KM/H or more but Less than 25 KM/H $200.00 3 Demerit Points

Speed by 25 KM/H or more but Less than 35 KM/H $265.00 4 Demerit Points Plus 1 Month Licence Suspension  

Speed by 35 KM/H or more but Less than 45 KM/H $360.00 6 Demerit Points Plus 6 Month Licence Suspension  

Speed by 45 KM/H or more $430.00 8 Demerit Points Plus 12 Month Licence Suspension  

from Vic Roads website

Q. How far over the speed limit is considered speeding to warrant an infringement?

A. The Victorian Government and Victoria Police consider any amount over the designated speed limit as speeding

zero tolerance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31812-beware/#findComment-643271
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...