Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i have a R33 that has the following mods

Trust catback

3" dump pipe

de cat

blitz pod

boost tee 9psi

walbro fuel pump

Last time its returned 255hp 188KW at 9psi (dont want to go any higher and goes into R&R after10psi)

i have a Power FC, plazaman plenum, front mount and tomei FPR to go on next but turbo choice

Is the 3076R to small with the .63 rear for the 25? and would the internal gate or external gate be better i would love to run external gate but is iit worth the extra money

i want fast response and good midrage to redline pull i want to use the car for daily driving, drift and every now and agian drag and curcuit. power comes second to response and relaiblilty for me i wont be pushing it to the extreme but i want headroom.

Yes i have upgraded all the suspension and braking in preperation for more power :/

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

IMO the .63 is to small for the GT3076 (given its a 300rwkw(+) turbo).

If you want super response and a .63, then a GT3071 fits into the equation there much better.

It should make around 250rwkw give/take and should still hold nicely to redline. It won't be anywhere near the top end the GT3076 will have (in a .82)... but all comes down to what you want.

More response or more top end. Something always has to give.

External gate is not required either way.

Are you using factory exhaust manifold or not?

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

way to much lag for a 25. I wouldnt go that setup unless it was a 3litre. Even still i think the gt3076r 0.82 in a 3litre would be my first choice.

Id go for an external gate. I regret not getting one on my gt3076r

way to much lag for a 25. I wouldnt go that setup unless it was a 3litre. Even still i think the gt3076r 0.82 in a 3litre would be my first choice.

Id go for an external gate. I regret not getting one on my gt3076r

might be a bit laggy but once it comes on its fun :D

3076r arent exactly the most responsive turbo either. i dont see 20psi until 4100rpm

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

How would it scare him making 300rwkw?

All it's going to do is be overtly laggy for the power and a silly suggestion really...

If there was intent to make 370-380rwkw then fine, GT35...

Fact is he isn't so getting a turbo that's oversized, for upto 300rwkw, and will make it overall slower - totally against what the OP wants anyway.

How would it scare him making 300rwkw?

All it's going to do is be overtly laggy for the power and a silly suggestion really...

If there was intent to make 370-380rwkw then fine, GT35...

Fact is he isn't so getting a turbo that's oversized, for upto 300rwkw, and will make it overall slower - totally against what the OP wants anyway.

cause ive got near 300rwkw with 3076 .82 and its boring only going off proof :D been in 350kw gt3582 and let me say alot more fun and alot f**king faster, but hey thats me

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

lol already bored with the 3076? should've kept your old turbo and get a set of cam gears :D . Well. I'm making 321rwkws out of it (hypergear build 3582 in .82 housing) at moment. I'm seeing full boost on 4300RPM, not much on 1st and low 2nd. but 4000rpm+ on 2nd, 3rd, 4th it flys. Need to get more traction.

and you need some thing bigger then .63 to work with a GT3076 core. But should be good enough for about 270rwkws mark if you can hold boost.

Edited by kwickr33
cause ive got near 300rwkw with 3076 .82 and its boring only going off proof :D been in 350kw gt3582 and let me say alot more fun and alot f**king faster, but hey thats me

He has a factory motor mate... come on... use some logic.

Of course a 350rwkw car is going to be more "fun" above 100km/h than a 300rwkw car. On the street however you've gotta argue what's going to actually be faster.

Mine with 280rwkw is virtually perfect, when it had 370rwkw it was just impossible.

Running 350rwkw through a factory motor that is going to see some circuit/drift... It won't last very long at all.

With a 3071 it will cover EVERY single base thing OP wants and still be in the realm of reliability.

He has a factory motor mate... come on... use some logic.

Of course a 350rwkw car is going to be more "fun" above 100km/h than a 300rwkw car. On the street however you've gotta argue what's going to actually be faster.

Mine with 280rwkw is virtually perfect, when it had 370rwkw it was just impossible.

Running 350rwkw through a factory motor that is going to see some circuit/drift... It won't last very long at all.

With a 3071 it will cover EVERY single base thing OP wants and still be in the realm of reliability.

yeah i understand nismoid.. just dont want him bolting on a so called balanced turbo that isnt going 2 give him that "wow" factor lol not saying 3076 is completey boring but it just doesnt cut it i dont think even for 300kw range hey.. maybe im fussy?

cause ive got near 300rwkw with 3076 .82 and its boring only going off proof :D been in 350kw gt3582 and let me say alot more fun and alot f**king faster, but hey thats me

sell it to me then...pm me if you REALLY want to get away from it.

must be internally gated though

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

Boring??? Small???

The 3076.82 i had on my car produced 370rwkw and had full boost by 3900rpm. Smashed anything on the rd and IMO a more of a handful than the GT3582.82 i have now.

Light switch power from low RPM compared to the gradual push of power from the 35R.

way to much lag for a 25. I wouldnt go that setup unless it was a 3litre. Even still i think the gt3076r 0.82 in a 3litre would be my first choice.

Id go for an external gate. I regret not getting one on my gt3076r

They are not as laggy as you think, a mate is running one on a stroked 2.4ltr 4cc vr4

Boring??? Small???

The 3076.82 i had on my car produced 370rwkw and had full boost by 3900rpm. Smashed anything on the rd and IMO a more of a handful than the GT3582.82 i have now.

Light switch power from low RPM compared to the gradual push of power from the 35R.

370rwkws with 3076 .82 On stock RB25det with 98 fuel? what boost?

Edited by kwickr33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...