Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i have a R33 that has the following mods

Trust catback

3" dump pipe

de cat

blitz pod

boost tee 9psi

walbro fuel pump

Last time its returned 255hp 188KW at 9psi (dont want to go any higher and goes into R&R after10psi)

i have a Power FC, plazaman plenum, front mount and tomei FPR to go on next but turbo choice

Is the 3076R to small with the .63 rear for the 25? and would the internal gate or external gate be better i would love to run external gate but is iit worth the extra money

i want fast response and good midrage to redline pull i want to use the car for daily driving, drift and every now and agian drag and curcuit. power comes second to response and relaiblilty for me i wont be pushing it to the extreme but i want headroom.

Yes i have upgraded all the suspension and braking in preperation for more power :/

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

IMO the .63 is to small for the GT3076 (given its a 300rwkw(+) turbo).

If you want super response and a .63, then a GT3071 fits into the equation there much better.

It should make around 250rwkw give/take and should still hold nicely to redline. It won't be anywhere near the top end the GT3076 will have (in a .82)... but all comes down to what you want.

More response or more top end. Something always has to give.

External gate is not required either way.

Are you using factory exhaust manifold or not?

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

way to much lag for a 25. I wouldnt go that setup unless it was a 3litre. Even still i think the gt3076r 0.82 in a 3litre would be my first choice.

Id go for an external gate. I regret not getting one on my gt3076r

way to much lag for a 25. I wouldnt go that setup unless it was a 3litre. Even still i think the gt3076r 0.82 in a 3litre would be my first choice.

Id go for an external gate. I regret not getting one on my gt3076r

might be a bit laggy but once it comes on its fun :D

3076r arent exactly the most responsive turbo either. i dont see 20psi until 4100rpm

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

How would it scare him making 300rwkw?

All it's going to do is be overtly laggy for the power and a silly suggestion really...

If there was intent to make 370-380rwkw then fine, GT35...

Fact is he isn't so getting a turbo that's oversized, for upto 300rwkw, and will make it overall slower - totally against what the OP wants anyway.

How would it scare him making 300rwkw?

All it's going to do is be overtly laggy for the power and a silly suggestion really...

If there was intent to make 370-380rwkw then fine, GT35...

Fact is he isn't so getting a turbo that's oversized, for upto 300rwkw, and will make it overall slower - totally against what the OP wants anyway.

cause ive got near 300rwkw with 3076 .82 and its boring only going off proof :D been in 350kw gt3582 and let me say alot more fun and alot f**king faster, but hey thats me

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

lol already bored with the 3076? should've kept your old turbo and get a set of cam gears :D . Well. I'm making 321rwkws out of it (hypergear build 3582 in .82 housing) at moment. I'm seeing full boost on 4300RPM, not much on 1st and low 2nd. but 4000rpm+ on 2nd, 3rd, 4th it flys. Need to get more traction.

and you need some thing bigger then .63 to work with a GT3076 core. But should be good enough for about 270rwkws mark if you can hold boost.

Edited by kwickr33
cause ive got near 300rwkw with 3076 .82 and its boring only going off proof :D been in 350kw gt3582 and let me say alot more fun and alot f**king faster, but hey thats me

He has a factory motor mate... come on... use some logic.

Of course a 350rwkw car is going to be more "fun" above 100km/h than a 300rwkw car. On the street however you've gotta argue what's going to actually be faster.

Mine with 280rwkw is virtually perfect, when it had 370rwkw it was just impossible.

Running 350rwkw through a factory motor that is going to see some circuit/drift... It won't last very long at all.

With a 3071 it will cover EVERY single base thing OP wants and still be in the realm of reliability.

He has a factory motor mate... come on... use some logic.

Of course a 350rwkw car is going to be more "fun" above 100km/h than a 300rwkw car. On the street however you've gotta argue what's going to actually be faster.

Mine with 280rwkw is virtually perfect, when it had 370rwkw it was just impossible.

Running 350rwkw through a factory motor that is going to see some circuit/drift... It won't last very long at all.

With a 3071 it will cover EVERY single base thing OP wants and still be in the realm of reliability.

yeah i understand nismoid.. just dont want him bolting on a so called balanced turbo that isnt going 2 give him that "wow" factor lol not saying 3076 is completey boring but it just doesnt cut it i dont think even for 300kw range hey.. maybe im fussy?

cause ive got near 300rwkw with 3076 .82 and its boring only going off proof :D been in 350kw gt3582 and let me say alot more fun and alot f**king faster, but hey thats me

sell it to me then...pm me if you REALLY want to get away from it.

must be internally gated though

3076 .82 is still boring and small

go bigger if u want something that will scare u a little.. maybe 3582r .82 mmm

Boring??? Small???

The 3076.82 i had on my car produced 370rwkw and had full boost by 3900rpm. Smashed anything on the rd and IMO a more of a handful than the GT3582.82 i have now.

Light switch power from low RPM compared to the gradual push of power from the 35R.

way to much lag for a 25. I wouldnt go that setup unless it was a 3litre. Even still i think the gt3076r 0.82 in a 3litre would be my first choice.

Id go for an external gate. I regret not getting one on my gt3076r

They are not as laggy as you think, a mate is running one on a stroked 2.4ltr 4cc vr4

Boring??? Small???

The 3076.82 i had on my car produced 370rwkw and had full boost by 3900rpm. Smashed anything on the rd and IMO a more of a handful than the GT3582.82 i have now.

Light switch power from low RPM compared to the gradual push of power from the 35R.

370rwkws with 3076 .82 On stock RB25det with 98 fuel? what boost?

Edited by kwickr33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...