Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3076 with 0.63 externally gated on a 6 boost sounds like a winner to me. Yes in 4th and 5th gears the 0.63 housing will be restricting top end power, but going by what you are asking for it sounds perfect.
I still don't like the idea of a 3076 with a .63.. tad small (the HKS housing is i think .78 ~ .74?)

Put a .82 on there or get a 3071

Nevertheless the 0.63 will give better response at the cost of some top end....but it will meet all the requirements and is sitting there ready to go. There will no boost control issues which is the major potential drawback of the 0.63 internally gated housing.

I think it is more a question of whether you want to go to an external gate vs internal gate as either turbo will work fine.

Hey guys, thought I would say I am almost finished putting on my 3076r with a .63 rear housing and welded steam pipe to 44m Tial gate on...

alot of people have told me alot of mixed answers, hoping to get a nice responsive 270-280kwish with roughly ~16psi... sound possible? (I checked dyno thread and as people have noticed, not much in there for this setup)

p.s soz, not trying to take over thread.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I still don't like the idea of a 3076 with a .63.. tad small (the HKS housing is i think .78 ~ .74?)

Put a .82 on there or get a 3071

They're 0.73 Nismoid, I made 291kW on my 3037S on BP 98 (19psi) and 342kW on a 24-22psi spike on E85. Full boost was around 4500rpm on an SR but you can play with cam timing and get them on sooner.

I guess it's not really comparing apples with apples since it's on a 2 litre, but just goes to show what those baby HKS housing are capable of flowing, and they along with the 3076R's are very aggressive.

ATP make a 0.78 divided housing for them too, this in my mind with a twin scroll/twin gate setup is the ultimate combo for someone chasing a solid 300kW on pump fuel with mega response. They also come in 0.82 and 1.06.

Getting a bit off track but still interesting and I've posted this somewhere else on SAU I'm pretty sure. As an example my two setups on pump fuel, SR20DET, my first one had a T88-34D and made 315kW at the wheels on 21psi, my 3037S made 291kW on 19psi. T88 trapped 125mph, 3037S 134mph. Even when the T88 was making 387kW, it ran 137mph on 29psi and a race tune!

Peak power doesn't always mean a faster car, suiting the power to your gearing and a chunky mid range it where it's at....

PJ

Again my opinion only but depending on what you're looking for a 0.63 A/R turbine housing is workable on a GT3076R , HKS had 0.61 and 0.73 A/R turbine housings (sadly non gated and T25/28 flange) available and I don't remember anyone saying they surged - provided they had the 3037"S" port shrouded compressor housing on them .

I'll quote from my HKS spec sheet and you be the judge .

Std 3037 48T - 420 PS

Std 3037 52T - 440 PS

Std 3037 56T - 450 PS

3037S ... 52T - 450 PS

3037S ... 56T - 480 PS

Everything I've read seems to suggest that the std compressor housings are aimed at four cylinder apps - generally larger cylinders that sixes and a flat plane crank meaning 180 degrees between power strokes .

Quite often HKS have port shrouded housings for sixes and specifically the Pro S turbos for RBs all have them .

I personally think the 76.2mm GT37 compressors work better with the full sized GT30 turbine and its the port shrouded comp housing that lets them get away with spinning the turbine/compressor group up earlier with smaller A/R turbine housings .

AFAIK the most responsive GT3076R combination using Garrett marketed bits would be the 52 trim compressor version with the 0.63 A/R GT30 turbine housing option . ATM you can buy this combination of bits and even get the port shrouded comp housing for it just like the 56T version .

Every one's different but for me getting some boost and extra torque at sane revs is ultimately more important than a sheet of paper saying 300 RWKW .

The system is out to get you on public roads and the situation is getting better for the authorities every day .

I think of it like this , when you drive your turbo car up long hills at 100/110 on expressways in its highest gear do you actually get any boost and can you sail up these hills effortlessly without changing down ? If the answer is no then IMO its not a very street friendly setup .

Like someone said the smallest T housing will ultimately limit the top end but in a road car that's not as important as broad spread of torque where its needed most .

My opinions only cheers A .

no worries i had a look and it is :rofl: so i think that if i stick with that see how it is and if i want to i can change to the .82 rear when i want to move up in power

What do you guys think?

Recent post in RB25 dyno results thread:

"unopened Neo Rb25det

-3076 56t with .64 housing

-highmount AM Performance stainless steampipe manifold with HKS 38mm gate

-Profec Spec B

-600cc injectiors

-fmic

-3.5 inch exh

-Nistune

310 rwkw @17 psi at around 6800 rpm

fullboost by 3500

roughly 480 nm torque at engine (calculated) "

POW! I would love to see a dyno sheet too.

Edited by Harey

hub dyno or not that still more than what i was after with the same sort of mods i am looking at and nice boost response :thumbsup:

i am excited now my only next decision is which is better

HKS low mount cast manifold External gate..... or

6boost high mount manifold with 48mm progate?

What do you guys think will work well with what i want to do with the car or either will be ok?

both i think have good and bad points HKS low mount so the police dont double look 6boost high mount so there is no hidding the turbo from them :P

what titan said

unless money isn't an option go etm manifold :(

i wanted to try and not use the stock manifold with a welded on gate but if the gains from either of the 2 in minimal then i do whats cost effective for the setup :P

Whats an ETM manifold i havnt heard of them before? Do you think that the HKS or 6boost would be better than the stock one?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...