Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok the time has come to start modifying my R34 GT-T. I have done alot of reading through this site and just want to confirm what I have read and ask a few questions i couldnt find answers to.

Note, my car is an R34 1998 GT-T 4 door auto

Basically im looking for a good street package, I want it to be responsive as possible (so will keep the stock turbo) but still gain as much midrange to top eng power as I can. It has to be a compromise as its a daily unfortunately. I was imagining 200-220rwkw is realistic through the auto retaining/gaining as much responsiveness as possible

What combos do people reckon without going over the top?

- 3inch cat backs seem to be the way to go, is it worth replacing the dump pipe for that level? (are they a big restriction on these?)

- is it worth getting a high flow cat for this power level?

- I was thinking of keeping the standard airbox (as i want as much cold air as possible) and just getting a high flow filter in the box

- Intercooler, i dont want to cut and sheet metal so what options do i have here?

- boost T to maybe 10-12psi? is this the way to go, or will the computer reject this and I need a retune?

- is it worth getting the car retuned for these mods?

what do people think of this combo, open to any thoughts, experiences and suggestions as this is my first turbo car and my first skyline

also depending on what you read these engines produce 187 or 206kw? whats the factory output on the 1998 auto gt-ts?

thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318621-modifying-my-r34-gt-t/
Share on other sites

1. turbo back is better for flow/restrictive.. yes it will help

2. Same with high flow cat..

3. Pod vs. Panel.. doesnt matter.. just stick to high flow panel if you prefer

4. Can get FMIC with standard return pipes still.. ARC etc

5. Adjusting the boost will need a retune.. Can either get SAFC or Nistune etc.. 10-12 psi is considered a safe boost level but still are just ceramic wheels..

6.yes tune it for the mods

+1 to what Craig said

I've read a few people hitting R&R when running around 12psi without an ecu upgrade (just something to keep in mind)

With regards to the FMIC, you will still need to cut some parts of your front bar to fit it nicely, and as above, a return flow will prove to be easiest to install and uses the factory piping in the engine bay, so no new holes required

Justjap.com are selling a few return flow type cooler kits, one being the JJR kit and also a Blitz return flow kit

i think the sedans may be a bit longer than the coupes. not sure about 33/34 compatiability. dump pipe, etc will fit, but it will come down to where the mounts are for the rear section of the muffler. few mins with a tape measure will give you a much better idea

good point thanks for that, i just did some research and discovered they have a 55mm shorter wheel base so it probably wont bolt in. thanks!

next question, I believe in keeping my cars regualy serviced so the car is getting a major as part of the modification list. As I am new to the skyline scene I need some advice/recommendations on a few things:

- I will be using the drift filters from autobarn, I am interested in peoples experiences with oils. I was trying to decide between the 10W40 synthetic nulon and the 5W30 synthetic castrol edge? i have heard the edge can make the engine a bit noisy? is this true or rubbish? keen to hear what people recommend

- thoughts on K&N panel filters? was keen to keep the stock airbox and CAI for police reasons and legality, also I want to keep as much cold air going in as possible

- how often should you change the timing belts on these engines?

- what is the recommended change period for fuel filters?

- I like using the iridium spark plugs, the part number in the catalouge recommends the long life platinum NGK ones, are these a good way to go?

thanks!

Hey mate.

- Castrol Edge is a little bit fake I reckon, better to go with Mobil 1, probably cost less too.

- With the air filter, if you want to keep the stock box, I would recommend a HKS air filter they come in what looks like a green sponge type layout, they are good from my experience.

- Timing belt as usual is every 100,000 km

- I think around every 5000 km is good to change oil and plugs if you want.

- From what I've heard copper plugs are the most responsive especially if you re-gap them.

Hope it helps

for spark plugs i would recommend the NGK copper plugs, part number BCPR6ES. you should get 10,000kms out of them (change them at every second oil change). works out cheaper than either the iridiums or platinums in the long run, and if you have decent coil packs then you may get 15,000 or even 20,000kms out of them. i pulled mine out after 10,000kms and they weren't very worn at all.

as for oil, every person you ask will give you a different opinion. if you can afford $100 or whatever mobil1 is these days then use it. it also comes down to what you are using the car for, what mods it has and how hard you drive. if you are just using it as a daily driver and it is pretty much stock and you don't give it a hard time then you can get away with using cheaper oils. just go with something either semi synthetic or a basic fully synthetic oil if it is just a daily driver for normal driving.

K&n panel filters are fine.

fuel filters every 20,000kms would be more than enough. not sure what the exact service interval is. probably much more than 20,000kms though.

timing belt is 100,000kms, and do water pump at the same time, as well as all the timing belt tensioners (don't just do the belt)

  • 2 weeks later...

220rwkw is running close to the limit of the stock turbo when put through a manual drivetrain. the auto drivetrain will result in more power loss, so you're unlikely to hit this figure using the stock turbo.

bear in mind you can get a reasonably mild highflow to the stock turbo which will allow you to maintain stock response while supporting 250rwkw+.

with all that being said, if you are set on keeping the stock turbo, if you want to hit your power limits, you're going to have to ensure that you address all supporting mods.

get a full turbo back exhaust including high flow cat, get an electronic boost controller, get a full retune (not just a piggyback system).

get a decent intercooler, you can get some brand name intercoolers which allow you to retain most of the stock piping.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any difference in induction noise?
    • If I got a dollar for every flipped commuter missile I've driven past I'd have two dollars   Some people get into wild adventures on the road and I doubt it's gender or ethnicity specific. I'm just glad I don't usually drive during peak times.
    • Just got the car back and gave it a good run back home Power wise, whilst it only made a extra 5 killerwasps up top at 7200 rpm, it made more power everywhere from 2500 rpm and kept pulling much harder all the way, to the point of me relearning when to shift so I don't hit the 7200 limiter, with the old intake it seemed to take alot more time to rev out, and, throttle response is also much improved  As I didn't want to remove the bumper every time I serviced the air filter (basically every aftermarket and fabricated CAI has the filter behind the bumper) it currently has a hektic exposed pod in the engine bay sucking in hot air, this will be rectified shortly after some some of my CAD (cardboard assisted design) for a alloy heat shield feed by the OEM intake tube behind the bumper, this will cop some wrinkle black paint, as well as the intake pipe for that totally OEM look... The only fly in the ointment was that the OEM "strut" brace doesn't fit over the rear runner of the new intake with the 2.5 engine is in the engine bay, as the 2.5 raises the engine up by 20mm, it's not a war stopper, and I didn't notice any difference without it in some twisties, but....... MX5 Mania is bringing in some GWR "fancy pants" braces that apparently do fit, if it bolts up I'll grab it, it is also stiffer than the OEM one, which is a bonus All in all I'm happy with the outcome      Fancy pants "strut" brace that gives the required clearance      This is where the clearance issue was, the GWR extends out past this
    • Well, I'm back from the dyno today. Some things do partially make sense. The pod filter/airbox delete picked up between 6-10rwkw on 98 - because heat soak does kind of affect things and there was playing with tune/timing/AFR. Oddly enough, the car was running much leaner than before. So lean it was audibly pinging on the dyno which I got video of:   70de0dd5-2099-4a71-8b10-6fc833fb9d59.mp4   We're talking going from ~12.7 in the past to the first run being at like ~14.0. It is now tuned to ~12.5 on the Dyno, which correlates to about ~12.1 on my wideband in the car. These matched last time, which is very odd. The dyno plots only show the dyno's reported AFR - should be last time, yet now it no longer agrees and was way leaner. Nobody has an explanation for how a pod can make the car run notably leaner, yet not really give any more power when you add fuel in. A few different types of intake design were tested:   94c22c34-7991-4902-af85-314b5f5bf352.mp4   There was no difference other than IAT with the pod sticking out of the bay. The pod sticking out of the bay (but connected) is actually still warmer than what I usually see on the road. Removing the pod entirely lost about ~2kw. But to be fair, all of the runs could be argued to vary by that amount when temperatures climb etc etc. It's safe to say that the filter isn't causing any restrictions of any note that can be reasonably altered in any way. This is in line with what I'd expect given the Engine Masters testing. 323KW on 98 and ~335KW on E85 is actually a pretty solid result, up about ~45kw from 99% of LS1 cammed combos, with generally much larger cams/exhaust etc as well. It is after all up 42KW (98) and 54KW (E85) from before. +10KW from a pod and removing the box is cheap as chips compared to what the head work cost per kw No, I did not get to drop the exhaust and test. When it comes to exhaust... it all just seems to change frequencies and cost or gain 2hp here or there. I don't realistically think I'll drop this to test it - because there's not much else I can really do about it/route it any other way/make it bigger/just bought mufflers. Engine masters beat the hell out of headers with a hammer to deliberately kink them and didn't lose power at all, I sincerely doubt that going larger primaries would help. If it were even possible for clearance/conversion reasons... which it's not... I may throw the E85 in there at some point and do a drag run to see what MPH it traps for science. It isn't lost on me that ~320kw Skylines do trap about the same MPH that ~370kw F-Body/Corvettes do in the USA for the same  or similar weight. (122-125mph). Of course, if I go there and trap 104mph or something then I'll just 'accidentally' have an accident on the way home from the drag strip and buy a M4.
×
×
  • Create New...