Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As many of you know. when you lower your nissan excessivly at the rear strange things happen to the geometrys.. also the driveshafts run at bad angles leaking to breakages and the handling of the car starts to go backwards. Most ppl will tell you to raise the car.. but wheres the fun in that! Anyway what you CAN do is correct the roll centre at the rear by raising the subframe up into the body by half an inch and effectibly flush mounting it. this way you can have a lowered car and correct the roll centre back to where nissan intended (somewhat).

If your running the traditional style alloy cradle bushes or pineapples on top of the subframe all round you have actually made things WORSE by lowering the subframe. sure in the case of alloy cradle locks its only 10mm but still.. its not an improvement.

I'll show you what i did by myself in my garage. pretty much done for a total cost of $120. that was to pay for the new bushes. everything else i did myself.

THE PROCESS

Start by ripping out the entire subframe.. with diff, arms and everything still attached.. all i took off was calipers and left them attached to brake lines to save bleeding brakes. i cable tied these in place.

Once the rear cradle is out... strip it down bare. remove everything til its just a bare cradle.. then go give it a wash with soapy water, degreaser and leave it in the sun to dry. then chuck it on the bench to start work,

Start with bracing the subframe... its a good idea to do this while its out as they are reknown for cracking the lower control arm mounts when tracked. I went a little over the top and bracked areas where i saw fit... do what you want in this area.

In this pic i braced the toe arm mounts together, cusco make a toe arm brace.. but why pay money when some steel and welding can do it for nothing. It has also created a new jacking point more rearward of the car for me. this is 50mmX6mm flat bar btw.

img0152b.jpg

middle re-enforcement

img0155ei.jpg

here i have used a small amount of flat and encased the mount for the rear LCA.

img0153l.jpg

and otherside

img0154fd.jpg

I chose to weld these triangle sections in... its not a known weak spot on the subframe but i had the materials, time and thought why not.

img0156c.jpg

Both sides

img0157zs.jpg

Next up is getting the stock rubber bushes out... this is a prick of a job and there are several ways to do it... the easiest and messiest way is to use an oxy and melt the rubber out and then an air saw to cut the sleve on the side to allow it to fall out after some taps... I chose to press them out using a simple garage 20t press and this still required the use of a hammer and chisel.

img0167ba.jpg

Next up... i threw some paint on it to stop exposed area's rusting. up to you

img0176z.jpg

Also got some new Cazman arms to replace my shitty china spec shit.

img0184ud.jpg

Got some Subframe bushes machined up. this is a design that me and a mate came up with and seems to be good so far. they will allow the subframe to travel up into the body by around 35-40mm.

img0190ro.jpg

They then install into the subframe.. designed to be a snug fit not a press fit. they will tap in with a block of wood to protect the alloy and a hammer.

img0194zg.jpg

they only go in one way :yes:

img0192yp.jpg

img0193ml.jpg

Now you can bolt it in. the shot here shows it test fitted but i find it easier to re-assy the cradle with all the diff/arms and hubs before refitting. Pics show bare cradle so you et the idea of clearances.

p5060209.jpg

p5060210.jpg

Watch the handbrake cables... they do have the potential to be crushed if your not routing them correctly. may have to bend a bracket here and there to make sure they clear

p5060211.jpg

Nice and close... can fit a sheet of paper between the pick up and mount haha

p5060212.jpg

So there you have it kids.. an easy mod you can do at home. Subframe bushes can be had for around $150 so if your handy its not an expensive exercise at all to stiffen up the rear end and increase the handling of your car.

this can be carried out on any Nissan IRS rear end.. for what its worth this is a S14 cradle.

Article by Simon Michelmore

2010

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thats a great write up but useless, unless you are prepared to strip the whole rear of the car..well done anyway ,i am about to do alloy subframe bushes those ones you made look awesome

As many of you know. when you lower your nissan excessivly at the rear strange things happen to the geometrys.. also the driveshafts run at bad angles leaking to breakages and the handling of the car starts to go backwards. Most ppl will tell you to raise the car.. but wheres the fun in that! Anyway what you CAN do is correct the roll centre at the rear by raising the subframe up into the body by half an inch and effectibly flush mounting it. this way you can have a lowered car and correct the roll centre back to where nissan intended (somewhat).

Just a question. How are you correcting the roll centre of the car by lowering the bodies mass further down towards the ground in relation to the suspension geometry. Most people run their cars higher because you need the mass of the car higher to to apply the weight onto the wheels. Wouldn't you need to run massive roll centre adjusters/spacers on your lower ball joints to now correct your roll centre through suspension geomentry? It just goes against what I have been told.

Possibly you should have raised your lower and upper arm mountig points on the sub frame to correct for the lowering of the centre of gravity. I think I have read one of the track guys (Duncan?) did the same mod as you but rasied his sup mounting points to correct geomentry. Its about the cars mass centre and something to do with an angle through your susp arms to where they land on the ground. Your mod would have pushed it out way beyond the wheels?

Its a really good mod to keep your driveshafts in one piece and its also good to see people out there actually working on their own cars and having a go.

Let me know if I'm completely wrong?

yeah you've got slightly wrong.

Your actually raising the subframe further up into the body not lowering the car down onto it.. the difference is the ride height does not change since the strut length is still the same.

when you lower the car by a fair amount two things happen. the axles have a tendicy to break and the susp arms are all at bad angles. your roll centre is also lowered beyound the factory setting and you induce jacking of the car during cornering. there is more leverage acting on the arms and you end up with more body roll rather then less.

by moving the subframe up all the arms get a little more towards where they should be, as well as the axles. and your roll centre is further up towards where nissan intended.

guys who have pineapples sitting between subframe and chassis are just making things worse by again excessivly lowering the subframe and increasing angles.

cutting and relocating mounts is a painful to go about doing things. and even then wouldnt fully correct the problem.

simon post pics of how your LCA now sits with your car lower. mine are pretty well dead flat. also with the front have you re-drilled your LCA / Castor arm up higher to recorect the front?

ps: im not gona add a jacking point in, its all back in the car :blush:

on another note... hows ya lock situation. i designed a weld on knuckle (based on a jap brand) which corrects geomatry in the front end and also gives epic lock. im looking at getting some made (not sure on cost yet), if your keen :)

pics on 32. (17x9.5 + 15) lca lengthened 20mm so -5 offset effective

Image0188.jpg

Edited by 32_Dave
  • 5 weeks later...

after some extensive testing yesterday i can say this is the most awesome mod done to my susp yet.... so much better to drive now!!

and no i wouldnt recommend it for a street car... the NVH levels go through the roof.

It is possible however to raise the subframe but not go the alloy bush route.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...