Jump to content
SAU Community

Would 2560-5 On A Stock R32 Engine Be Laggier Than The Standard Plain Bearing Standard Turbos


Recommended Posts

Quick question

Would 2560-5 on a stock r32 engine be laggier than the standard plain bearing standard turbos.

I already have power fc, 550cc injectors and exhaust and EBC. Will be upgrading dump pipes as well as Cam gears.

Would this setup produce more lag than a standard R32 GTR?

Thought as much.

If they were no laggier I would think of using them. I thought the benefit of ball bearing would offset the bigger turbo response issue.

I have a set of HKS 2510's that i pulled off a mates car here...if you want stock response and more top end this is the turbo of choice.

I think he may sell them if you are interested...pm me if your keen.

Thought as much.

If they were no laggier I would think of using them. I thought the benefit of ball bearing would offset the bigger turbo response issue.

ignore the bb core and look at the trims.

yeah they are massive compared to standard turbos. I can't really think of any aftermarket turbo that has the same response as standard simply because they are all bigger and capable of more power. BB cores do bugger all. if you had 2 turbos of exactly the same compressor AR, same size and same wheel size and wheel trims and one was BB and one plain bearing you would struggle to pick any response difference between them. when running the plain bearing is running on a thin film of oil and they actually spin very freely with good oil flow. the key to response is in the size/trim of the turbo. -5s are what 350hp each? that's 700hp worth of airflow, of course it's going to be laggy!

I thought if its not too much different 500 - 1000rpm I would just stick with a new pair of -5's I have. Given it sounds like there is going to be a fair bit of difference I am looking at using -9's.

Mind you this car barely see's the road so doesn't need to be driven daily or anything but it is running standard engine internals with 135,000km under its belt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I think in the modern era we live in, if I were converting a hydro lifter head to solid, particularly when chasing revs, I'd be seeing what I could do to use shimless buckets. Those of us with Neos usually have this persistent niggling fear of a shim getting spat out and ruining everything. Shim-over is...yucky that way. At least the Tomei kit appears to be conventional, but it would still be nice if they'd decided to go shimless.
    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
×
×
  • Create New...