Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i've done a compression and leak down test on my rb26 to see if i can determine why it burns about a qt of oil between changes (5000Kms)

Ive somewhat ruled out valve seals because it doesnt smoke on start up even after sitting for some days, neither on deceleration, neither on idle.

There is slight white/blue on hard accel but i cannot see it in from inside the car....i was told this by a friend driving behind.

It fills the catch can with less than a table spoon of oil during the period also.

Anyway here are the results...

...Compression________________Leak down

....DRY........WET____________DRY...........WET

1) 155.........200 __________1) 12%..........10%

2) 151.........200___________2) 8%...........7%

3) 160.........205___________3) 10%.........10%

4) 157.........200___________4) 11%.........11%

5) 145.........190___________5) 15%.........14%

6) 152.........198___________6) 20%.........14%

Did not hear any air escaping through the intake,exhaust,through the coolant etc, only through the dip stick hole and the oil fill cover...about the same amount for all cylinders

So what do u guys think Rings or turbos or....???

Yeah I thought that might have been the case.

It would show different symptoms usually for turbo, as you have mentioned. It would more than likely get smoke on startup after leaving it overnight. Which would lead you to either stem seals or turbo, but the test there pretty much points to rings for me anyway, that will be the smoke under acceleration too.

Did you perform your own comp test prior to purchasing? How long have you had it for?

I started the engine when it was on the ground and did a comp test, no. 5 was a little lower that the rest...same as it is now, and then did a next test after about 5-6mths of running in the car and it was more or less the same....just 1-2psi difference

I used a different gauge this time tho so i cant compare it to the last results, and it has been about another 6mths since the last test.

Going from the difference between the wet and dry test on no. 6 it points to rings, but is that difference so bad??? ie. from 20% to 14%.....

I would of thought there might have been a larger difference in leak down between wet and dry on no. 5 seeing that it had the lowest comp.

The car still makes good power tho.

Yeah I know what your saying re no 5, I would have expected a different result there.

Maybe take it to a reputable garage and have another test done, can't hurt having another set of results to compare with. Should cost sub $100, and you can then get another opinion as well. Was the test performed at WOT?

Personally I think your looking at combined blow by across all cylinders. Not anything major, but enough to cause that amount of oil loss over x period of time. In any event, whether it's one cylinder, 2, or all of them, the end result is the same, it will need a rebuild in order to resolve it.

If it's making good power and still pulls strong, then leave it for a bit longer and just watch your oil.

You could even investigate running a different grade oil in order to minimize it.

Don't mind getting a second opinion at all but there is no one locally to do it that's why i had to buy my own equipment to do it!

Its a cheap gauge from harbor freight in the states though, so i dont know how accurate it is......did each test about four times though to ensure a consistent result!

The comp test seems more or less ok for a rb with some ks on it....just no. 5 is a little lower but yet doesn't show any improvement in leak down when it was done wet.

Oil control rings was suggested as a probable cause but neither a comp test nor leak down would determine this right???

Test was done wot on a warm motor using redline 20w50

Yeh....

I got one of those small greddy copy catch can filled with copper scuff pad thingy with one 1/2" hose from the cam covers running to it then back to original spot on the rear turbo

Is it possible that the 1/2" hose is too small??

The rest of the pcv system is stock.

I dont think there excessive pressure in the sump tho....It does not blow out the dipstick and it isnt on that tight

  • 4 weeks later...

2 things to try:

Cold comp test (not on a warmed up motor)

Comp test with a cap full of oil down the cylinder (also cold)

Doing it cold may show you less impressive results, and major variances in the results from a cap full of oil in the bore shows worn rings.

Perhaps remove your front pipe and look for evidence of a greasy burn, all turbos with worn seals have been a little greasy in the exhaust housing that I have worked on.

Realistically you are going to have to make your own decision here.. Another thing to note, is your breather setup stock (I noted you said you had a catch can) and how is it setup.

Unfortunately these things are not as simply diagnosed as they are said, GL.

Do the plugs show any signs that it's burning oil?

Just to make sure....If its burning oil what color will the plugs be??

Also going by the comp and leak down results is ok for me to rule out the bottom end as the problem or is it still possible for it to have good comp and oil getting past bad oil control rings and being burnt???

2 things to try:

Cold comp test (not on a warmed up motor)

Comp test with a cap full of oil down the cylinder (also cold)

Doing it cold may show you less impressive results, and major variances in the results from a cap full of oil in the bore shows worn rings.

With regards to the cap of oil, isn't that what the "wet" and "dry" readings referred to?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...